Weird Science

Chemiluminescence of Metallic Sodium

Polish ver­sion is here

The fol­lo­wing article was ori­gi­nally publi­shed in the jour­nal for edu­ca­tors Che­mia w Szkole (eng. Che­mi­stry in School) (1/2014):

Ilustracja

Ples M., Che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scen­cja meta­licz­nego sodu (eng. Che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence of Metal­lic Sodium), Che­mia w Szkole, 1 (2014), Wydaw­nic­two Edu­Press, pp. 5-7

Intro­duc­tion

Che­mi­stry, as a scien­ti­fic disci­pline, stu­dies both the pro­per­ties of sub­stan­ces that make up our world and the trans­for­ma­tions they undergo. Che­mi­cal reac­tions can be under­stood as pro­ces­ses in which cer­tain sub­stan­ces are trans­for­med into others, mani­fe­sting chan­ges in phy­si­cal and che­mi­cal pro­per­ties — such as state of mat­ter, den­sity, odor, or color. It’s impor­tant to note, howe­ver, that these chan­ges are not always per­cep­ti­ble to our sen­ses. This expla­ins the com­mon per­cep­tion that such reac­tions merely trans­form mat­ter. Yet we know that che­mi­cal pro­ces­ses are also accom­pa­nied by energy chan­ges. Often, these are rela­ti­vely sub­tle and, per­haps for that rea­son, are some­ti­mes tre­a­ted in edu­ca­tion as some­thing secon­dary or less impor­tant.

Che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scent reac­tions belong to the class of exer­go­nic reac­tions, in which visi­ble light is gene­ra­ted at the expense of che­mi­cal energy. Explo­ring this phe­no­me­non can be an enga­ging way to enrich che­mi­stry edu­ca­tion. Che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence is distinct from incan­de­scence, which invo­lves light emit­ted due to high tem­pe­ra­ture.

One might won­der why we usu­ally limit our demon­stra­tions to just the ther­mal effects of a reac­tion. One fac­tor could be that che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scent reac­tions seem less fami­liar. In rea­lity, many such reac­tions have been tho­ro­u­ghly docu­men­ted. A more signi­fi­cant issue is that the neces­sary reac­tants are often expen­sive, highly toxic, not easily acces­si­ble, or may requ­ire com­plex syn­the­sis in a school labo­ra­tory that is typi­cally not well-equ­ip­ped. Howe­ver, this is not a suf­fi­cient excuse — che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence can be demon­stra­ted using rela­ti­vely com­mon sub­stan­ces.

Che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence was first obse­rved in 1669 by the Ger­man alche­mist Hen­nig Brand. He obta­i­ned the white allo­trope of pho­spho­rus and noted that it emit­ted a gre­e­nish-yel­low glow, cle­arly visi­ble in the dark. We now know that this lumi­ne­scence results from the slow oxi­da­tion of pho­spho­rus. Never­the­less, this reac­tion is not one you would want to per­form your­self, as white pho­spho­rus is extre­mely toxic — a lethal dose for an adult, whe­ther inge­sted or inha­led, is aro­und 0.1 g (0.0035 oz). There is also a fire hazard: finely divi­ded white pho­spho­rus igni­tes imme­dia­tely, even at room tem­pe­ra­ture.

A much les­ser-known exam­ple of che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence is the glow obse­rved during the oxi­da­tion of alkali metals, pri­ma­rily sodium and potas­sium. Sodium is com­monly ava­i­la­ble in school che­mi­stry labs, where it is used to demon­strate the reac­ti­vity of Group 1 ele­ments. While sodium is highly reac­tive, it is not con­si­de­red toxic under stan­dard labo­ra­tory con­di­tions, and its resi­dues can be dispo­sed of without exces­sive dif­fi­culty. All of these cha­rac­te­ri­stics make the slow oxi­da­tion of sodium an excel­lent exam­ple for illu­stra­ting che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence, even tho­ugh its glow is dim­mer than that of pho­spho­rus.

Expe­ri­ment and Obse­rva­tions

Set­ting up the expe­ri­ment is stra­i­ght­for­ward. You’ll need a small block of sodium — just a few cubic cen­ti­me­ters (e.g., aro­und 0.06–0.18 in3) in volume. Sodium must always be sto­red under oil or kero­sene. In this expe­ri­ment, it’s more conve­nient to use sodium sto­red in kero­sene, because the sam­ple must be tho­ro­u­ghly dried using a paper towel or fil­ter paper. Due to its reac­ti­vity, the sur­face of the metal is usu­ally cove­red with oxi­des and other reac­tion pro­ducts (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Sodium is very soft, so you can slice thro­ugh it with a knife to reveal the pure, silvery sur­face of the metal (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2

The sur­face of the sodium quic­kly beco­mes dull due to its reac­tion with atmo­sphe­ric oxy­gen. This pro­cess sho­uld be obse­rved in a dar­ke­ned room. After allo­wing your eyes a few minu­tes to adjust, you can see a faint but distinc­tly visi­ble yel­lo­wish glow. It can be pho­to­gra­phed (Fig. 3) with a long expo­sure time (ISO 400, 60 s, con­trast enhan­ced).

Fig. 3

We can the­re­fore obse­rve sodium’s che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence under fairly ordi­nary con­di­tions. Note that the glow appe­ars only on fre­shly expo­sed metal sur­fa­ces, while areas hea­vily coa­ted with oxi­des remain dark.

You may won­der whe­ther the effect can be inten­si­fied. As is gene­rally known, the rate of most che­mi­cal reac­tions incre­a­ses with tem­pe­ra­ture — and the same applies here. Higher tem­pe­ra­tu­res sho­uld yield a bri­gh­ter glow. To achieve this, cut a thin slice of sodium, place it on a metal sheet, and heat it on a hot plate (Fig. 4A) to about 40–50°C (104–122°F). Oxi­da­tion pro­ce­eds noti­ce­a­bly faster, and che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence beco­mes visi­ble after only a few seconds in the dark. The effect can be seen in Fig. 4B (ISO 400, 20 s, con­trast enhan­ced).

Fig. 4

The inten­sity of the glow is une­ven — it is par­ti­cu­larly bri­ght in the spot where the oxide layer was scra­ped off just before the photo was taken (Fig. 4B, mar­ked with an aste­risk), reve­a­ling fresh metal. Blo­wing dry air onto the sam­ple inten­si­fies the lumi­ne­scence by sup­ply­ing addi­tio­nal oxy­gen. Howe­ver, do not use pure oxy­gen, as it may cause a sodium fire that is very dif­fi­cult to extin­gu­ish!

After the expe­ri­ment, any rema­i­ning metal sho­uld be retur­ned to a con­ta­i­ner fil­led with oil or kero­sene so it can be reu­sed in future expe­ri­ments. Smal­ler frag­ments can be safely destroyed by reac­ting them with water. This sho­uld be done cau­tio­u­sly and in small por­tions, due to the vigo­rous exo­ther­mic reac­tion.

Expla­na­tion

Accor­ding to the law of con­se­rva­tion of energy, energy can­not sim­ply appear from nothing or vanish without a trace. If the total inter­nal energy of the pro­ducts is lower than that of the reac­tants, the excess energy must be rele­a­sed into the envi­ron­ment. This usu­ally takes the form of heat, but in the case of che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence, a por­tion of the energy is emit­ted as elec­tro­ma­gne­tic radia­tion with wave­leng­ths cor­re­spon­ding to visi­ble light. Thus, under the right con­di­tions, white pho­spho­rus, lumi­nol, luci­ge­nin, and even metal­lic sodium can emit visi­ble light when oxi­di­zed.

Che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scent reac­tions gene­rally fol­low the scheme below:

X → [Y]* → Y + hν

The reac­tant(s) X trans­form into an inter­me­diate [Y]* in an exci­ted, high-energy state. This state is unsta­ble and spon­ta­ne­o­u­sly converts into a lower-energy pro­duct Y. The sur­plus energy is rele­a­sed in the form of radiant energy, .

Rese­arch sug­ge­sts that in sodium’s case, che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence most likely results from the reac­tion of ato­mic oxy­gen (O) with the sodium oxide radi­cal NaO. As this highly reac­tive radi­cal oxi­di­zes to sta­ble sodium oxide Na2O — the final pro­duct — energy is rele­a­sed. Because the quan­tum yield of this reac­tion is rela­ti­vely low (even by che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scent stan­dards), most of the energy is dis­si­pa­ted as heat. Only a very small frac­tion emer­ges as faint yel­low light. In humid air, lumi­ne­scence is signi­fi­can­tly wea­ker, due to a com­pe­ting reac­tion between sodium and water vapor, which pro­du­ces sodium hydro­xide (NaOH), a non-lumi­ne­scent pro­duct.

It is worth noting that the reac­tion descri­bed here also occurs in nature, not just in labo­ra­tory con­di­tions. In fact, it takes place in Earth’s atmo­sphere, near the boun­dary of the ther­mo­sphere, at an alti­tude of about 90km (56mi), where a layer of disper­sed sodium atoms exi­sts. The resul­ting radia­tion is extre­mely faint but can be detec­ted using spe­cia­li­zed instru­ments such as pho­to­mul­ti­plier tubes.

This phe­no­me­non appe­ars to be ana­lo­gous to the che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence of white pho­spho­rus.

Fur­ther rea­dings:

All pho­to­gra­phs and illu­stra­tions were cre­a­ted by the author.

This text has under­gone sli­ght edi­to­rial modi­fi­ca­tions com­pa­red to the ver­sion publi­shed in the jour­nal to bet­ter suit online pre­sen­ta­tion.

Marek Ples

Aa