Weird Science

Enzymes: Catalysts of Life

Polish ver­sion is here

The fol­lo­wing article was ori­gi­nally publi­shed in the jour­nal for edu­ca­tors Che­mia w Szkole (eng. Che­mi­stry in School) (3/2016):

Ilustracja

Ples M., Enzymy - bio­lo­giczne kata­li­za­tory (eng. Enzy­mes: Cata­ly­sts of Life), Che­mia w Szkole (eng. Che­mi­stry in School), 3 (2016), Agen­cja AS Józef Szew­czyk, pp. 6-11

Enzy­mes are large bio­mo­le­cu­les, most com­monly pro­te­ins, that act as highly spe­ci­fic bio­lo­gi­cal cata­ly­sts. They signi­fi­can­tly acce­le­rate a wide variety of che­mi­cal reac­tions that toge­ther form the bio­che­mi­cal basis of life.

Reac­tions invo­lving enzy­mes typi­cally pro­ceed much faster than those occur­ring without cata­ly­tic assi­stance. For instance, car­bo­nic anhy­drase, one of the fastest known enzy­mes, can cata­lyze the conver­sion of car­bon dio­xide CO2 and water H2O into bicar­bo­nate ions HCO3 at a rate of about 106 reac­tions per second. This repre­sents an acce­le­ra­tion of nearly 107 times com­pa­red to the unca­ta­ly­zed reac­tion [1] [2].

Altho­ugh the dige­stive effect of gastric secre­tions on pro­te­ins had been obse­rved out­side the living body as early as the 18th cen­tury [3], it was not until the 19th and early 20th cen­tu­ries that rese­ar­chers such as Louis Pasteur, Wil­helm Kühne, and Edu­ard Buch­ner fully elu­ci­da­ted the nature of enzyme acti­vity. Buch­ner’s work with yeast-deri­ved enzy­mes ear­ned him the Nobel Prize in 1907 [4].

Enzy­mes are cate­go­ri­zed into six [cur­ren­tly seven, author's note: 2025] pri­mary clas­ses accor­ding to the types of reac­tions they cata­lyze. Each class is desi­gna­ted by a uni­que Enzyme Com­mis­sion (EC) num­ber [5]:

From a bio­lo­gi­cal per­spec­tive, the role of enzy­mes is truly fun­da­men­tal. By par­ti­ci­pa­ting in nearly all ana­bo­lic and cata­bo­lic reac­tions, they shape the ove­rall archi­tec­ture of meta­bo­lism. Enzy­mes direct the flow of meta­bo­lic path­ways by selec­ti­vely cata­ly­zing spe­ci­fic che­mi­cal trans­for­ma­tions. In doing so, they influ­ence how mole­cu­les are pro­ces­sed, how energy is mana­ged, and how essen­tial cel­lu­lar func­tions are car­ried out.

At first glance, it may seem that wor­king with highly spe­cia­li­zed sub­stan­ces like enzy­mes is limi­ted to advan­ced rese­arch labo­ra­to­ries. Howe­ver, this couldn't be fur­ther from the truth. In fact, the pre­sence of various enzy­mes in bio­lo­gi­cal mate­rial can be detec­ted using sur­pri­sin­gly sim­ple tech­ni­ques. These acces­si­ble methods can be both edu­ca­tio­nal and dee­ply rewar­ding for any­one curious about explo­ring the world of bio­che­mi­stry.

Ure­a­ses

Ure­a­ses are enzy­mes from the hydro­lase class that cata­lyze the hydro­ly­sis of urea CO(NH2)2, pro­du­cing ammo­nia NH3 and car­bon dio­xide CO2.

In the active site of natu­rally occur­ring ure­a­ses, the metal ion pre­sent is typi­cally nic­kel. Howe­ver, labo­ra­tory stu­dies have shown that cata­ly­tic acti­vity can also be achie­ved when this metal is sub­sti­tu­ted with man­ga­nese or cobalt [6]. The mole­cu­lar mass of the active form of the enzyme is appro­xi­ma­tely 500 kDa.

This enzyme is found in yea­sts, various bac­te­ria (such as Heli­co­bac­ter pylori), and in cer­tain higher plants, inc­lu­ding the jack bean Cana­va­lia ensi­for­mis, a mem­ber of the Faba­ceae (legume) family. It was from this plant that ure­ase was first iso­la­ted in 1926 by James B. Sum­ner, who went on to demon­strate that the enzyme is a pro­tein [7].

For the pur­po­ses of our expe­ri­ments, conve­nient sour­ces of ure­ase inc­lude rea­dily ava­i­la­ble seeds from vege­ta­ble soy­bean Gly­cine max, field pump­kin Cucur­bita pepo, or giant pump­kin Cucur­bita maxima. The seeds may be dried, but it is essen­tial that they have not been expo­sed to high tem­pe­ra­tu­res during pro­ces­sing.

Photo 1 – Mate­rial con­ta­i­ning ure­ase; A – whole vege­ta­ble soy­bean seeds Gly­cine max, B – seeds gro­und in a mor­tar

Place a small amo­unt of seeds rich in ure­ase, such as soy­be­ans, into a mor­tar (Photo 1A). Altho­ugh the seeds are quite firm, grin­ding them pro­du­ces a yel­lo­wish pow­der after a short time (Photo 1B). Suspend this pow­der in 20 to 30 cm3 (0.7 to 1.0 fl oz) of water at room tem­pe­ra­ture and fil­ter the mixture. It is per­fec­tly accep­ta­ble if the resul­ting extract rema­ins sli­gh­tly clo­udy (Photo 2). The solu­tion can be sto­red in a refri­ge­ra­tor for seve­ral days. Just before con­duc­ting the expe­ri­ment, divide the extract into two equal por­tions. Leave one por­tion unchan­ged, and bring the other to a boil for a few minu­tes, then allow it to cool to room tem­pe­ra­ture.

Photo 2 – Soy­bean seed extract

To test for ure­ase acti­vity, pre­pare an aqu­e­ous solu­tion of urea at a con­cen­tra­tion of appro­xi­ma­tely 8%, and add a few drops of an alco­ho­lic solu­tion of bro­mo­thy­mol blue C27H28Br2O5S. This pH indi­ca­tor turns yel­low in aci­dic envi­ron­ments (pH below 7), blue in alka­line con­di­tions (pH above 7), and green when the pH is close to neu­tral (pH ≈ 7).

The resul­ting solu­tion sho­uld have a pH close to neu­tral or sli­gh­tly aci­dic. If it appe­ars blue, which indi­ca­tes an alka­line envi­ron­ment, this can be cor­rec­ted by adding a small amo­unt of dilu­ted acid such as ace­tic acid CH3COOH.

Distri­bute the pre­pa­red urea solu­tion into three small bea­kers. The first (Photo 3A) will serve as the con­trol. To the second, add a few cubic cen­ti­me­ters (about 0.1–0.2 fl oz) of the raw soy­bean extract (Photo 3B), and to the third, add the extract that was pre­vio­u­sly boi­led (Photo 3C). Leave the bea­kers undi­stur­bed for a few minu­tes.

Photo 3 – Cata­ly­tic acti­vity of soy­bean seed extract; A, D – urea solu­tion with indi­ca­tor (con­trol); B, E – urea solu­tion with raw extract and indi­ca­tor; C, F – urea solu­tion with pre­vio­u­sly boi­led extract and indi­ca­tor. Top row – mixing time (t = 0 min), bot­tom row – solu­tions after t = 5 min

After just a few minu­tes, a noti­ce­a­ble color change occurs as the solu­tion turns blue. Howe­ver, this hap­pens only in the sam­ple con­ta­i­ning the raw soy­bean seed extract (Photo 3E). This change results from ure­ase cata­ly­zing the reac­tion descri­bed by the fol­lo­wing equ­a­tion:

CO(NH2)2 + H2O → CO2 + 2NH3

The ammo­nia pro­du­ced fur­ther under­goes hydro­ly­sis in an aqu­e­ous envi­ron­ment accor­ding to reac­tion:

NH3 + H2O ⇌ NH4+ + OH

The reac­tion envi­ron­ment beco­mes alka­line, as evi­den­ced by the visi­ble color change of the solu­tion con­ta­i­ning the pH indi­ca­tor.

If the reac­tion is allo­wed to pro­ceed lon­ger, a cha­rac­te­ri­stic pun­gent odor of ammo­nia beco­mes distinc­tly noti­ce­a­ble.

The cru­cial role of ure­ase is high­li­gh­ted by the absence of any reac­tion in the con­trol sam­ple. Cle­arly, ure­ase signi­fi­can­tly acce­le­ra­tes the hydro­ly­sis of urea com­pa­red to the unca­ta­ly­zed reac­tion. In fact, even after weeks of wai­ting, no signs of reac­tion would appear in the con­trol sam­ple.

The lack of reac­tion in the third sam­ple sug­ge­sts that the ele­va­ted tem­pe­ra­ture used to treat the soy­bean extract in this case inac­ti­va­ted the enzyme. Fur­ther­more, this loss of ure­ase acti­vity is irre­ver­si­ble, as coo­ling the boi­led extract back to room tem­pe­ra­ture does not restore its func­tion.

It is impor­tant to note that ure­ase can act as a potent toxin under cer­tain con­di­tions. Howe­ver, this would requ­ire direct intro­duc­tion into the blo­od­stream. Thro­ugh the hydro­ly­sis of urea, which is pre­sent in small amo­unts in blood, toxic ammo­nia would be gene­ra­ted. For­tu­na­tely, con­su­ming foods con­ta­i­ning ure­ase poses no risk, as the enzyme is sim­ply dige­sted like other pro­te­ins.

Pero­xi­da­ses

Ano­ther group of intri­gu­ing enzy­mes are pero­xi­da­ses, clas­si­fied within the oxi­do­re­duc­tase family. These enzy­mes cata­lyze the oxi­da­tion of various sub­stra­tes by hydro­gen pero­xide H2O2, fol­lo­wing the gene­ral scheme (X – sub­strate, XO – oxi­da­tion pro­duct):

H2O2 + X → H2O + XO

Pero­xi­da­ses are found in both ani­mal and plant tis­sues. A rela­ti­vely high con­cen­tra­tion of these enzy­mes is pre­sent in the root of com­mon hor­se­ra­dish Armo­ra­cia rusti­cana (Photo 4), a widely distri­bu­ted plant from the Bras­si­ca­ceae family com­monly used as a spice.

Photo 4 – Root of com­mon hor­se­ra­dish Armo­ra­cia rusti­cana

Hor­se­ra­dish pero­xi­dase (HRP), iso­la­ted from the root of hor­se­ra­dish, is a gly­co­pro­tein, mea­ning a pro­tein cova­len­tly lin­ked with oli­go­sac­cha­ri­des. Its mole­cu­lar wei­ght is appro­xi­ma­tely 44 kDa. The enzyme’s coen­zyme com­po­nent is a heme group [9].

The pero­xi­dase acti­vity in hor­se­ra­dish root can be demon­stra­ted thro­ugh seve­ral methods. One par­ti­cu­larly stri­king appro­ach invo­lves the enzy­ma­tic oxi­da­tion of lumi­nol. To per­form this, pre­pare an alka­line che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scent solu­tion by dis­so­lving 0.3 g of sodium car­bo­nate Na2CO3 and 0.05 g of lumi­nol in 100 cm3 (appro­xi­ma­tely 3.4 fl oz) of distil­led water. If sodium car­bo­nate is una­va­i­la­ble, alka­line con­di­tions can alter­na­ti­vely be achie­ved by adding a small amo­unt of ammo­nium hydro­xide NH3(aq) or sodium hydro­xide NaOH.

Imme­dia­tely before the expe­ri­ment, add 5 cm3 (appro­xi­ma­tely 0.17 fl oz) of 3% phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal-grade hydro­gen pero­xide to the solu­tion. Then, intro­duce a piece of hor­se­ra­dish root, pre­fe­ra­bly cut from its inte­rior (Photo 5). If hor­se­ra­dish is una­va­i­la­ble, com­mon par­sley root Petro­se­li­num cri­spum, which also con­ta­ins the enzyme, can serve as a sub­sti­tute.

Photo 5 – Hor­se­ra­dish root immer­sed in lumi­nol solu­tion

After dar­ke­ning the room, the effect shown in Photo 6 beco­mes visi­ble. The solu­tion, upon con­tact with the plant tis­sue, emits a distinc­tly visi­ble light cha­rac­te­ri­stic of the lumi­nol oxi­da­tion reac­tion under alka­line con­di­tions.

Photo 6 – Che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence of lumi­nol solu­tion in con­tact with hor­se­ra­dish root tis­sue

The expe­ri­ment can also be per­for­med by apply­ing the solu­tion to a cross-sec­tion of the root using a Pasteur pipette (Photo 7A). In this case, the lumi­ne­scence appe­ars une­ven, with some areas of the cross-sec­tio­nal sur­face glo­wing noti­ce­a­bly less than others. While part of this varia­tion may result from mecha­ni­cal damage during sam­ple pre­pa­ra­tion, it pri­ma­rily reflects dif­fe­ren­ces in pero­xi­dase con­tent.

Photo 7 – Enzy­ma­tic che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence of lumi­nol, A – appli­ca­tion of lumi­nol solu­tion to the root cross-sec­tion sur­face, B – che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence of the solu­tion in con­tact with plant tis­sue.

Lumi­nol che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence is known to be trig­ge­red by various acti­va­tors, such as iron(III), cobalt(II), and cop­per(II) com­plex com­po­unds solu­ble in alka­line envi­ron­ments [10]. Howe­ver, in this case, the reac­tion is cata­ly­zed spe­ci­fi­cally by hor­se­ra­dish pero­xi­dase pre­sent in the root, resul­ting in the emis­sion of blue light.

Because the che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scent reac­tion of lumi­nol is cata­ly­zed, among others, by hemo­glo­bin, lumi­nol is widely used in foren­sic science to detect the pre­sence of blood, for exam­ple, at crime sce­nes. Blood sta­ins expo­sed to lumi­nol emit a distinct glow, which can be obse­rved with the naked eye or cap­tu­red pho­to­gra­phi­cally. Howe­ver, a chal­lenge ari­ses from the wide­spread occur­rence of pero­xi­da­ses, which, as demon­stra­ted ear­lier, also cata­lyze this reac­tion. The same issue applies to other methods, such as the cata­ly­tic oxi­da­tion of leuco dyes, for instance the conver­sion of color­less leu­co­ma­la­chite green to its colo­red form in alka­line con­di­tions or the oxi­da­tion of non-flu­o­re­scent leu­co­flu­o­re­scein to flu­o­re­scent flu­o­re­scein under UV light [11]. One pos­si­ble way to address this pro­blem is based on the fact that pero­xi­da­ses, like most enzy­mes, are highly sen­si­tive to ele­va­ted tem­pe­ra­tu­res. Brie­fly hea­ting the sam­ple to an appro­priate tem­pe­ra­ture effec­ti­vely abo­li­shes pero­xi­dase acti­vity, so a posi­tive result after such tre­at­ment incre­a­ses con­fi­dence in the pre­sence of hemo­glo­bin and thus blood.

The acti­vity of pero­xi­dase can also be demon­stra­ted by its cata­ly­tic oxi­da­tion of color­less ben­zi­dine to colo­red pro­ducts using hydro­gen pero­xide, or by the oxi­da­tion of potas­sium iodide KI to free iodine, which can be easily detec­ted using a starch suspen­sion [12].

Pro­te­a­ses

Pro­te­a­ses, also known as pro­te­o­ly­tic enzy­mes, belong to the hydro­lase class and cata­lyze pro­te­o­ly­sis, which is the hydro­ly­sis of pep­tide bonds. A pep­tide bond is the amide lin­kage for­med between amino acids that make up pro­te­ins and pep­ti­des.

Pro­te­a­ses are some­ti­mes refer­red to as pep­ti­da­ses and can be clas­si­fied into two main gro­ups:

Pro­te­a­ses are found in both ani­mals and plants. In ani­mals, they play cru­cial roles such as serving as dige­stive enzy­mes, while in plants they often ful­fill pro­tec­tive func­tions [13].

Pro­te­a­ses are pre­sent in nume­rous plants. Nota­ble exam­ples inc­lude bro­me­lain found in the fruit of the edi­ble pine­ap­ple Ana­nas como­sus, acti­ni­din pre­sent in the fru­its of kiwi­fruit spe­cies such as Acti­ni­dia deli­ciosa and Acti­ni­dia chi­nen­sis, as well as papain found in the unripe fruit of the papaya tree Carica papaya.

To empi­ri­cally demon­strate pro­te­ase acti­vity, the easiest appro­ach is to use pine­ap­ple or kiwi fruit. It is impor­tant to use only fresh or fro­zen fruit, as can­ned fruit is unsu­i­ta­ble due to heat tre­at­ment applied during pro­ces­sing.

I used a pine­ap­ple fruit (Photo 8) for my expe­ri­ment. Only small amo­unts of the mate­rial are requ­i­red; the rema­in­der can be con­su­med to bene­fit the body’s nutri­tion.

Photo 8 – Fruit of the pine­ap­ple Ana­nas como­sus

An extract from pine­ap­ple fruit can be easily pre­pa­red by mashing a small amo­unt of pulp with a lit­tle water, fol­lo­wed by fil­te­ring the resul­ting mixture. The liquid obta­i­ned displays a yel­low colo­ra­tion (Photo 9) and can be sto­red under refri­ge­ra­tion for seve­ral days.

Photo 9 – Pine­ap­ple fruit extract

But how can one demon­strate that bro­me­la­ins, the pro­tein-degra­ding enzy­mes, are truly pre­sent in pine­ap­ple fruit? A com­mon method invo­lves using gela­tin, a mixture of par­tially hydro­ly­zed col­la­gen pro­ducts.

Photo 10 – Effect of pro­te­a­ses from pine­ap­ple fruit on the gela­tin-set­ting pro­cess:
A – gela­tin solu­tion in water (con­trol sam­ple), B – gela­tin solu­tion in water with pine­ap­ple extract (test sam­ple), C – gel for­med in the con­trol sam­ple, D – no gel for­ma­tion in the test sam­ple

Start by pre­pa­ring a gela­tin solu­tion by dis­so­lving 10 g of gela­tin in 100 cm³ (appro­xi­ma­tely 3.4 fl oz) of hot water. Once the solu­tion cools sli­gh­tly, but before it begins to set, add a small amo­unt of water to one sam­ple (con­trol, Photo 10A) and an equal amo­unt of pine­ap­ple extract to the other (test, Photo 10B). Place both sam­ples in a cool loca­tion and let them sit for seve­ral hours.

After some time, you’ll notice that the con­trol sam­ple soli­di­fies into a firm gel (Photo 10C). In con­trast, the sam­ple with pine­ap­ple extract rema­ins com­ple­tely liquid (Photo 10D). Even after a long period, it will not gel. How can this be expla­i­ned?

As we know, at any tem­pe­ra­ture above abso­lute zero, all par­tic­les are in motion, with their velo­city incre­a­sing as the tem­pe­ra­ture rises. In a hot gela­tin solu­tion, long pro­tein cha­ins undergo vigo­rous, ran­dom move­ments. As the tem­pe­ra­ture decre­a­ses, these move­ments slow down, and hydro­gen bonds begin to form between dif­fe­rent regions of the same chain or between sepa­rate cha­ins. Altho­ugh hydro­gen bonds are rela­ti­vely weak, their large num­ber at lower tem­pe­ra­tu­res allows them to play a domi­nant role in aggre­ga­ting the long poly­pep­tide cha­ins. Water mole­cu­les become trap­ped within this emer­ging network, lea­ding to the for­ma­tion of a gel.

When pro­te­a­ses such as bro­me­lain, which is deri­ved from pine­ap­ple, are pre­sent in the solu­tion, they cata­lyze the hydro­ly­tic cle­a­vage of pep­tide bonds. This results in free amino acids and short pep­tide frag­ments that are too small to aggre­gate and form a gel.

Agar, also known as agar-agar, is a sub­stance with pro­per­ties simi­lar to gela­tin. It is extrac­ted from marine red algae belon­ging to the Rho­do­phyta phy­lum. Unlike gela­tin, which con­si­sts of pro­te­ins and pep­ti­des, the pri­mary com­po­nent of agar is aga­rose, a poly­sac­cha­ride com­po­sed of galac­tose deri­va­ti­ves C6H12O6. As a result, agar-based sys­tems are capa­ble of for­ming a gel even in the pre­sence of high con­cen­tra­tions of pro­te­a­ses (Photo 11). Pro­te­a­ses do not cata­lyze the bre­ak­down of sugars, so they do not inter­fere with the soli­di­fi­ca­tion of agar solu­tions.

Photo 11 – Aga­rose gel for­med despite the pre­sence of pro­te­a­ses

From this expe­ri­ment, it beco­mes clear that it is not pos­si­ble to pre­pare a gela­tin-based jelly fla­vo­red with natu­ral pine­ap­ple, kiwi, or papaya juice. The rea­son lies in the pro­te­o­ly­tic enzy­mes natu­rally pre­sent in these fru­its, which pre­vent gela­tion. Altho­ugh apply­ing suf­fi­cien­tly high tem­pe­ra­tu­res deac­ti­va­tes the enzy­mes, it also alters the fla­vor, which may be unde­si­ra­ble. Never­the­less, such des­serts can still be suc­cess­fully pre­pa­red using agar as the gel­ling agent.

Amy­la­ses

Amy­la­ses, also known as amy­lo­ly­tic enzy­mes, belong to the hydro­lase class, much like pro­te­a­ses and ure­a­ses. Howe­ver, instead of cata­ly­zing the bre­ak­down of pro­te­ins or urea, they faci­li­tate the hydro­ly­sis of starch and other poly­sac­cha­ri­des [14]. In ani­mals, amy­la­ses are found in saliva and pan­cre­a­tic juice. In plants, they are pre­sent in various tis­sues, inc­lu­ding fru­its and ger­mi­na­ting seeds.

Given the ava­i­la­bi­lity of raw mate­rials, we will attempt to con­firm the amy­lo­ly­tic acti­vity of sali­vary amy­lase, for­merly known as pty­a­lin.

To pre­pare the star­ting solu­tion, dis­so­lve seve­ral grams of potato starch in 100 cm³ (appro­xi­ma­tely 3.4 fl oz) of hot water, then fil­ter and allow it to cool.

Fill three test tubes with the starch solu­tion. The first tube, without any addi­ti­ves, will serve as the con­trol sam­ple (Photo 12A). To the second tube, add a small amo­unt of saliva dilu­ted five­fold with distil­led water (Photo 12B), while to the third, add a simi­lar amo­unt of saliva solu­tion that has been brie­fly boi­led (Photo 12C). The liquid in all tubes is color­less. Leave the solu­tions at room tem­pe­ra­ture for about one to two hours. Alter­na­ti­vely, if incu­ba­ted at appro­xi­ma­tely 37°C (98.6°F), only a few minu­tes are nee­ded.

After this period, exa­mine the con­tents of the tubes. All three solu­tions appear unchan­ged, rema­i­ning color­less (Photo 12D, E, F). To verify the pre­sence of starch, add a few drops of com­mer­cially ava­i­la­ble iodine solu­tion, either alco­ho­lic or aqu­e­ous (with potas­sium iodide KI), to each tube.

The result may come as a sur­prise since the cha­rac­te­ri­stic deep blue colo­ra­tion of the iodine-starch com­plex appe­ars only in the solu­tion without amy­lase (Photo 12G) and in the solu­tion con­ta­i­ning amy­lase that was pre­vio­u­sly hea­ted to boi­ling tem­pe­ra­ture (Photo 12I), which inac­ti­va­ted the enzyme. In the solu­tion with active amy­lase, no blue colo­ra­tion was obse­rved; instead, the solu­tion rema­i­ned brown due to dis­so­lved iodine. This cle­arly indi­ca­tes that the enzyme effec­ti­vely broke down the long-chain poly­sac­cha­ri­des in starch into shor­ter frag­ments that do not form the blue iodine com­plex.

Photo 12 – Effect of amy­lase on starch at 37ºC (98.6ºF); A, D, G – starch solu­tion (con­trol sam­ple), B, E, H – starch solu­tion with added saliva (test sam­ple), C, F, I – starch solu­tion with added boi­led saliva; top row – fre­shly pre­pa­red solu­tions, mid­dle row – solu­tions after 15 minu­tes at room tem­pe­ra­ture (no visi­ble chan­ges), bot­tom row – solu­tions after 15 minu­tes with added iodine (G, I – blue starch-iodine com­plex, H – absence of blue colo­ra­tion)

Sali­vary amy­lase hydro­ly­zes starch into mal­tose and dextrins, repre­sen­ting an ini­tial stage of poly­sac­cha­ride dige­stion that begins in the oral cavity.

Expla­na­tion

As you can see, enzy­mes are found vir­tu­ally eve­ry­where, both aro­und us and within our bodies, and they are sur­pri­sin­gly easy to detect. You can rea­dily obse­rve their pro­per­ties fir­sthand.

Enzy­mes are pri­ma­rily pro­tein cha­ins of vary­ing leng­ths, ran­ging from just a few dozen amino acids (e.g., 4-oxa­lo­cro­to­nate tau­to­me­rase) to over 2,500 amino acids in a sin­gle chain (such as ani­mal fatty acid syn­thase) [15] [16]. The region of the chain that binds and inte­racts with the sub­strate, con­ta­i­ning amino acids essen­tial for cata­ly­sis, is known as the enzyme's active site. In addi­tion to sub­stra­tes, enzy­mes can also bind other mole­cu­les, such as cofac­tors, which modu­late their cata­ly­tic acti­vity.

In living cells, enzy­mes are syn­the­si­zed by ribo­so­mes as linear cha­ins of amino acids, which then fold into spe­ci­fic three-dimen­sio­nal struc­tu­res. An enzyme’s func­tion is deter­mi­ned by this spa­tial con­for­ma­tion. Ele­va­ted tem­pe­ra­tu­res can cause pro­te­ins to dena­ture, resul­ting in struc­tu­ral alte­ra­tions that typi­cally eli­mi­nate cata­ly­tic acti­vity. This effect was demon­stra­ted in the enzyme expe­ri­ments discus­sed ear­lier.

The effect of tem­pe­ra­ture within the non-dena­tu­ring range is also easy to obse­rve. For exam­ple, in the case of amy­lase, reac­tion rates incre­ase with tem­pe­ra­ture. Most enzy­mes ope­rate with opti­mal effi­ciency within a nar­row tem­pe­ra­ture and pH range.

Ano­ther defi­ning cha­rac­te­ri­stic of enzy­mes is their high sub­strate spe­ci­fi­city, often far exce­e­ding that of inor­ga­nic cata­ly­sts. For instance, pro­te­a­ses from pine­ap­ple spe­ci­fi­cally hydro­ly­zed the pro­te­ins in gela­tin but had no effect on agar. This may seem sur­pri­sing, since both pro­te­ins and poly­sac­cha­ri­des are com­po­sed of long poly­mer cha­ins. Enzy­mes, howe­ver, often exhi­bit even more refi­ned spe­ci­fi­city for their sub­stra­tes. The mecha­ni­sms of enzy­ma­tic action are fre­qu­en­tly expla­i­ned using models such as the lock-and-key, three-point inte­rac­tion, or indu­ced fit the­o­ries.

Enzy­mo­logy is a rapi­dly evo­lving disci­pline that explo­res the occur­rence, struc­ture, func­tion, mecha­ni­sms of action, and prac­ti­cal appli­ca­tions of enzy­mes.

Enzyme acti­vity can also be influ­en­ced by addi­tio­nal fac­tors, such as the pre­sence of metal ions. There are many fasci­na­ting expe­ri­ments to explore in this area, and I enco­u­rage rea­ders to try them for them­se­lves.

Refe­ren­ces:

All pho­to­gra­phs and illu­stra­tions were cre­a­ted by the author.

This text has under­gone sli­ght edi­to­rial modi­fi­ca­tions com­pa­red to the ver­sion publi­shed in the jour­nal to bet­ter suit online pre­sen­ta­tion.

Adden­dum

Here is a video sho­wing the expe­ri­ment with hor­se­ra­dish pero­xi­dase descri­bed above.

Marek Ples

Aa