Weird Science

Is It Blood? Exploring Forensic Investigations

Polish ver­sion is here

The fol­lo­wing article was ori­gi­nally publi­shed in the jour­nal for edu­ca­tors Bio­lo­gia w Szkole (eng. Bio­logy in School) (2/2022):

Ilustracja

Ples M., Is it Blood? A Lit­tle Foren­sic Science, Bio­lo­gia w Szkole (eng. Bio­logy in School), 4 (2022), Forum Media Pol­ska Sp. z o.o., pp. 53-56

Let's take a moment to stop at our handy library. Whe­ther crime novels are our favo­rite lite­rary genre or not, Aga­tha Chri­stie's books are – in my hum­ble opi­nion – bey­ond repro­ach [1]. The unfor­get­ta­ble Her­cule Poi­rot in one of them sta­tes that:

A case of mur­der is a case of mur­der whe­ther it hap­pe­ned yester­day or sixteen years ago

Chri­stie A., Five Lit­tle Pigs

1942

This is indi­spu­ta­ble. But how can we know if a mur­der really took place, or if it was just an unfor­tu­nate acci­dent? That’s when the inve­sti­ga­tion begins…

One of the most impor­tant tasks is deter­mi­ning the pre­sence of blood at the crime scene, on objects that could be the instru­ments of the crime, or on items belon­ging to the suspect. Howe­ver, today’s inve­sti­ga­tor has more effec­tive methods at their dispo­sal than the hero of an Aga­tha Chri­stie novel could have ever ima­gi­ned. One of them is a tech­ni­que for detec­ting even very small amo­unts of blood based on the che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scent pro­per­ties of spe­ci­fic sub­stan­ces.

Expe­ri­ment

Che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence can be defi­ned as a phe­no­me­non during which elec­tro­ma­gne­tic radia­tion is emit­ted – mainly from the visi­ble light spec­trum, but many defi­ni­tions also allow ultra­vio­let and infra­red radia­tion – as a result of spe­ci­fic che­mi­cal reac­tions. The pro­ducts for­med in this pro­cess exist in a ther­mo­dy­na­mi­cally unsta­ble exci­ted state, which then tran­s­i­tions to a lower-energy gro­und state. The energy dif­fe­rence is rele­a­sed into the envi­ron­ment (direc­tly or via other mole­cu­les) as light [2].

Many sub­stan­ces exhi­bit che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence, inc­lu­ding luci­fe­rin with luci­fe­rase (used by, for exam­ple, fire­flies from the Lam­py­ri­dae family), white pho­spho­rus, sin­glet oxy­gen, lofina, the pyro­gal­lol-for­mal­de­hyde sys­tem, poly­phe­nols from green tea, Wöh­ler’s silo­xane – an inte­re­sting orga­no­si­li­con com­po­und, and many others.

A highly effec­tive che­mi­lu­mi­no­phore is lumi­nol C8H7N3O2, which is the hydra­zide of 3-amino-phtha­lic acid (Fig. 1). Under nor­mal con­di­tions, lumi­nol is usu­ally in the form of a fine cry­stal­line pow­der, ran­ging from cream to yel­lo­wish to light brown in color [3].

Ilustracja
Fig. 1 – Struc­tu­ral for­mula of lumi­nol

Inte­re­stin­gly, under appro­priate con­di­tions, lumi­nol can help detect even very small amo­unts of blood, or more pre­ci­sely, the red respi­ra­tory pig­ment con­ta­i­ned in ery­th­ro­cy­tes – hemo­glo­bin.

To pre­pare the rea­gent for detec­ting blood, we only need potas­sium hydro­xide KOH (or sodium NaOH) and hydro­gen pero­xide H2O2 with a con­cen­tra­tion of 3%, which is the typi­cal hydro­gen pero­xide ava­i­la­ble in phar­ma­cies.

To start the expe­ri­ment, we need to dis­so­lve a few pel­lets of potas­sium hydro­xide in about 20 cm3 (0.68 fl oz) of distil­led water – the exact amo­unt isn’t cri­ti­cal. Then, to the alka­li­zed solu­tion, we add a small amo­unt of lumi­nol – think of the size of a match­stick tip as a guide to how small an amo­unt of this sub­stance is nee­ded (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1 – Amo­unt of lumi­nol nee­ded to pre­pare the solu­tion

It’s worth noting that lumi­nol dis­so­lves very poorly in pure water, but much bet­ter in a basic solu­tion. Next, we add 5 cm3 (0.17 fl oz) of hydro­gen pero­xide (3%) to the solu­tion. The resul­ting rea­gent is almost color­less, with just a very faint yel­lo­wish tint (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2 – Blood detec­tion rea­gent

This rea­gent is unfor­tu­na­tely unsta­ble and sho­uld be used quic­kly – ide­ally within a few hours. The alka­line lumi­nol solu­tion can be sto­red lon­ger in the dark and in a refri­ge­ra­tor, but in such cases, hydro­gen pero­xide sho­uld be added direc­tly before use.

To test the rea­gent, we enco­un­ter a pro­blem, as blood is nee­ded. I would like to cau­tion aga­inst using even small blood sam­ples of unk­nown ori­gin, as they may be infec­tious. A good and safe method is to use dried ani­mal blood – for exam­ple, from pigs – ava­i­la­ble com­mer­cially and often used by fisher­men for bait. Photo 3 shows the iso­la­ted and dried bovine hemo­glo­bin used in my expe­ri­ments.

Fig. 3 – Dried hemo­glo­bin

Pour a small amo­unt of the rea­gent into a small bea­ker and add a drop of blood or a pinch of dried blood (or hemo­glo­bin iso­late). As seen in Fig. 4A, the iso­late flo­ats on the sur­face of the liquid – we can only notice sli­ght foa­ming of the solu­tion due to the oxy­gen rele­a­sed from the decom­po­si­tion of hydro­gen pero­xide.

Fig. 4 – Reac­tion reve­a­ling the pre­sence of blood; A – under light, B – in the dark

In the dark, howe­ver, we will easily notice that the solu­tion, when in con­tact with a sub­stance con­ta­i­ning hemo­glo­bin, starts to glow bri­gh­tly in a beau­ti­ful blue color (Fig. 4B). If we stir the liquid, the effect beco­mes even more spec­ta­cu­lar, as the entire volume of the solu­tion glows with bri­ght light (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5 – Effect after stir­ring the solu­tion

The descri­bed reac­tion is actu­ally used as a pre­li­mi­nary test for the pre­sence of blood at a crime scene or on spe­ci­fic objects. This is done by spray­ing the rea­gent onto the area or object in que­stion. The obse­rva­tion is not made with the naked eye, as the emit­ted light signals may be too weak – pho­to­gra­phs with exten­ded expo­sure times are used to help with this.

Howe­ver, this method has many limi­ta­tions. To under­stand one of them, and how to over­come it, we need to pre­pare a sim­ple simu­la­tion of a crime scene situ­a­tion. For this, we smear some fresh or dried blood, or hemo­glo­bin iso­late, at a spe­ci­fic spot on a clean sheet of paper, and next to it, we place, for exam­ple, some juice squ­e­e­zed from par­sley root Petro­se­li­num cri­spum or hor­se­ra­dish Armo­ra­cia rusti­cana. The paper sho­uld then be dried at room tem­pe­ra­ture, pre­fe­ra­bly away from direct sun­li­ght. Both spots on the paper sho­uld be mar­ked with pen­cil-drawn circ­les, as shown in Fig. 6.

Fig. 6 – Rea­gent spe­ci­fi­city test; a – hemo­glo­bin smear, b – par­sley root extract stain; top – under light, before spray­ing with rea­gent, bot­tom – in the dark after spray­ing with rea­gent (ISO­400, expo­sure time: 5s)

As seen, after spray­ing the rea­gent in the dark, we can obse­rve that the smear of blood (hemo­glo­bin) starts to glow. Inte­re­stin­gly, it turns out that che­mi­cal sub­stan­ces in the par­sley root extract also have the same pro­perty of cata­ly­zing lumi­nol che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence. Unfor­tu­na­tely, che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence cau­sed by com­po­nents of blood can­not be easily distin­gu­i­shed from the glow cau­sed by con­tact with many plant extracts, which for various rea­sons can be found almost eve­ry­where.

Let’s now check the effect of incre­a­sed tem­pe­ra­ture on the expe­ri­ment. The second sheet of paper, pre­pa­red in the same way, with sme­ars of the sub­stan­ces of inte­rest, sho­uld be dried at an ele­va­ted tem­pe­ra­ture (at least 140°F/60°C), for exam­ple by pres­sing it with an iron, and then sprayed with the rea­gent as before (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7 – Rea­gent spe­ci­fi­city test (after tre­a­ting sam­ples at ele­va­ted tem­pe­ra­ture); a – hemo­glo­bin smear, b – par­sley root extract stain; top – under light, before spray­ing with rea­gent, bot­tom – in the dark after spray­ing with rea­gent (ISO­400, expo­sure time: 5s)

Note that after tre­a­ting with ele­va­ted tem­pe­ra­ture, the plant extract smear lost the abi­lity to make the rea­gent glow, while the blood smear reta­i­ned this abi­lity. As we see, hea­ting the sam­ples allows the eli­mi­na­tion of false posi­ti­ves cau­sed by plant extracts.

Addi­tio­nally, we must remem­ber that the lumi­nol rea­gent test is destruc­tive, mea­ning that sam­ples on which it has been per­for­med can­not be used for fur­ther ana­ly­sis. Due to its limi­ta­tions, this test sho­uld be tre­a­ted as a pre­li­mi­nary or sup­por­tive method.

Expla­na­tion

The mecha­nism of the reac­tion invo­lves the oxi­da­tion of lumi­nol in an alka­line envi­ron­ment in the pre­sence of a cata­lyst. In an alka­line solu­tion, lumi­nol dis­so­cia­tes to form a dou­bly char­ged anion. Due to keto-enol tau­to­me­ri­za­tion, two dif­fe­rent forms of the com­po­und are pro­du­ced, dif­fe­ring in the struc­ture and distri­bu­tion of nega­tive charge: the keto­nic form, where the nega­tive charge is loca­ted on nitro­gen atoms, and the enol form, with the charge con­cen­tra­ted on oxy­gen atoms. The enol form under­goes fur­ther reac­tion. It is oxi­di­zed in an alka­line envi­ron­ment by hydro­gen pero­xide, pro­du­cing a cyc­lic pero­xide. Because of the pero­xide bridge in its struc­ture, this che­mi­cal spe­cies is highly unsta­ble, lea­ding to its rapid spon­ta­ne­ous decom­po­si­tion, which pro­du­ces nitro­gen mole­cu­les and 3-amino-phtha­lan. Impor­tan­tly, the lat­ter com­po­und is for­med in an exci­ted state, which then tran­s­i­tions to the gro­und state. Accor­ding to the prin­ci­ple of energy con­se­rva­tion, the excess energy is emit­ted into the envi­ron­ment as light, here blue light.

The cata­lyst for this reac­tion can be various com­plex com­po­unds, such as iron. In many expe­ri­ments with lumi­nol as a cata­lyst, potas­sium fer­ri­cy­a­nide K3[Fe(CN)6] is used, altho­ugh it is, of course, absent from blood.

In the case of blood, the cata­lyst for the descri­bed reac­tion is hemo­glo­bin. It con­si­sts of a pro­tein part – glo­bin – and a pro­sthe­tic heme group with a struc­ture simi­lar to por­phy­rins (Fig. 2) [4]. In the heme mole­cule, the appro­priate por­phy­rin con­ta­ins a fer­ric cation, immo­bi­li­zed by four iron-nitro­gen bonds. For­mally, two of these bonds are cova­lent, and two are coor­di­na­tive, altho­ugh in rea­lity, they are equ­i­va­lent.

Ilustracja
Fig. 2 – Struc­tu­ral for­mula of heme

It sho­uld be noted that simi­lar reac­tions are exhi­bi­ted by various plant enzy­mes, such as pero­xi­da­ses found in hor­se­ra­dish or par­sley roots. These are, of course, pro­te­ins, so sub­jec­ting them to high tem­pe­ra­tu­res cau­ses dena­tu­ra­tion and loss of cata­ly­tic abi­lity. Heme, being a non-pro­tein com­po­nent, is more resi­stant to ele­va­ted tem­pe­ra­tu­res, which is why we can per­form a dif­fe­ren­tia­ting test.



Refe­ren­ces:

All pho­to­gra­phs and illu­stra­tions were cre­a­ted by the author.

This text has under­gone sli­ght edi­to­rial modi­fi­ca­tions com­pa­red to the ver­sion publi­shed in the jour­nal to bet­ter suit online pre­sen­ta­tion.

Marek Ples

Aa