Weird Science

Light from the Chemist’s Retort

Polish ver­sion is here

The fol­lo­wing article was ori­gi­nally publi­shed in the jour­nal for edu­ca­tors Che­mia w Szkole (eng. Che­mi­stry in School) (5/2014):

Ilustracja

Ples M., Świa­tło z retorty (eng. Light from the Che­mist’s Retort), Che­mia w Szkole (Che­mi­stry in School), 5 (2014), Agen­cja AS Józef Szew­czyk, pp. 33-34.

Che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence is the phe­no­me­non of light emis­sion pro­du­ced as a result of spe­ci­fic che­mi­cal reac­tions. Many sub­stan­ces exhi­bit che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence during the course of reac­tions, usu­ally oxi­da­tion: luci­fe­rin in the pre­sence of the enzyme luci­fe­rase, lumi­nol, the pyro­gal­lol-for­mal­de­hyde sys­tem, white pho­spho­rus, and even metal­lic sodium [1]. This phe­no­me­non can also be obse­rved in sin­glet oxy­gen.

Oxy­gen is a gas that natu­rally exi­sts as dia­to­mic mole­cu­les. For mole­cu­lar oxy­gen (O2), the gro­und state is the tri­plet form (3O2), cha­rac­te­ri­zed by two unpa­i­red elec­trons, making it a radi­cal (Fig. 1A). In con­trast, an exci­ted oxy­gen mole­cule with all elec­trons pai­red exi­sts in the sin­glet state (1O2). There are two forms of sin­glet oxy­gen, dif­fe­ring in the distri­bu­tion of elec­trons in the mole­cu­lar π*2p orbi­tals:

Ilustracja
Fig. 1

Oxy­gen exhi­bits an unu­sual pro­perty — tri­plet oxy­gen (3O2), which is a radi­cal, is the gro­und state, while sin­glet oxy­gen, with fully pai­red elec­trons, cor­re­sponds to an exci­ted state with higher energy.

As one might expect, the sin­glet form of oxy­gen is unsta­ble and can spon­ta­ne­o­u­sly tran­s­i­tion to the tri­plet state. Accor­ding to the law of energy con­se­rva­tion, the excess energy can be rele­a­sed, for exam­ple, during an oxi­da­tion reac­tion or in the form of elec­tro­ma­gne­tic radia­tion within the visi­ble (or adja­cent) spec­trum.

For an iso­la­ted oxy­gen mole­cule, howe­ver, the tran­s­i­tion from the tri­plet to the sin­glet state is stric­tly for­bid­den by selec­tion rules gover­ning inte­rac­tions with elec­tro­ma­gne­tic radia­tion. This makes such a tran­s­i­tion highly impro­ba­ble. Sen­si­ti­zers (mainly orga­nic dyes such as methy­lene blue or por­phy­rins) can faci­li­tate this pro­cess [2].

Sin­glet oxy­gen can also be gene­ra­ted che­mi­cally, for exam­ple, by pas­sing a stream of chlo­rine gas thro­ugh an alka­line, coo­led 30% hydro­gen pero­xide solu­tion (Photo 1). Altho­ugh this method is com­monly sug­ge­sted, it pre­sents a signi­fi­cant draw­back from a tea­ching per­spec­tive: the neces­sity of han­dling chlo­rine gas, which is highly toxic and is dif­fi­cult to store safely [3].

Photo 1 – Pro­duc­tion of sin­glet oxy­gen using free chlo­rine (ISO: 400, 5s)

The­re­fore, I pro­pose an alter­na­tive, sim­pler, and safer method for pro­du­cing sin­glet oxy­gen and obse­rving its che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence. This requ­i­res only two rela­ti­vely acces­si­ble sub­stan­ces:

Sodium dich­lo­ro­i­so­cy­a­nu­rate is com­monly used as a disin­fec­tant for sani­tary appli­ca­tions. The com­mer­cial pro­duct, usu­ally ava­i­la­ble in tablet form (Photo 2), typi­cally con­ta­ins at least 80% sodium dich­lo­ro­i­so­cy­a­nu­rate and is well-sui­ted for this expe­ri­ment.

Photo 2 – Sodium dich­lo­ro­i­so­cy­a­nu­rate tablet

Per­hy­drol is highly cor­ro­sive and cau­ses necro­tic damage upon con­tact with skin. Avoid con­ta­mi­na­tion of eyes or skin at all costs! The use of glo­ves and pro­tec­tive eye­wear is essen­tial! Sodium dich­lo­ro­i­so­cy­a­nu­rate is harm­ful, and when it comes into con­tact with water or acids, it rele­a­ses toxic gases. During the reac­tion, chlo­rine gas is rele­a­sed, which is highly toxic — work must be con­duc­ted under a fume hood or out­do­ors!

The expe­ri­ment itself is sim­ple. Pour appro­xi­ma­tely 30 cm3 (1.01 fl oz) of per­hy­drol into a 100-200 cm3 (3.38-6.76 fl oz) bea­ker. Then, dar­ken the room and add sodium dich­lo­ro­i­so­cy­a­nu­rate in pow­der or tablet form. A vigo­rous reac­tion occurs, rele­a­sing a large amo­unt of gas and pro­du­cing foam. Simul­ta­ne­o­u­sly, che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence can be obse­rved — a beau­ti­ful, bri­ght red glow (Photo 3).

Photo 3 – Che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence of sin­glet oxy­gen (ISO: 400, 5s)

Expla­na­tion

Ini­tially, water reacts with the dich­lo­ro­i­so­cy­a­nu­rate anion:

C3N3O3Cl2- + 2H2O → C3N3O3H2- + 2H+ + 2ClO-

This reac­tion pro­du­ces hydro­gen cations and anions: cya­nu­rate and hypo­ch­lo­rite [4]. The hypo­ch­lo­rite ion fur­ther reacts with hydro­gen pero­xide:

ClO- + H2O2 → ClOO- + H2O

The resul­ting pero­xy­ch­lo­rate anion is unsta­ble and decom­po­ses into oxy­gen and chlo­ride anions:

ClOO-1O2 + Cl-

The oxy­gen ini­tially exi­sts in the sin­glet state. During its tran­s­i­tion to the more sta­ble tri­plet form, the energy dif­fe­rence must be rele­a­sed into the sur­ro­un­dings accor­ding to the law of energy con­se­rva­tion, often in the form of emit­ted light.

The energy dif­fe­rence between the gro­und state and the sin­glet state with two pai­red elec­trons in the same π*2p orbi­tal is 94.3 kJ/mol, cor­re­spon­ding to a wave­length of appro­xi­ma­tely 1270 nm, which lies in the near-infra­red range. This che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence would, of course, be invi­si­ble to the naked eye, as the emit­ted light is out­side the visi­ble spec­trum.

Howe­ver, at high con­cen­tra­tions of sin­glet oxy­gen, ano­ther emis­sion occurs at 634 nm (red light). This hap­pens when two 1O2 mole­cu­les inte­ract. This phe­no­me­non is what we obse­rve in the expe­ri­ment.

The reac­tion can be sche­ma­ti­cally repre­sen­ted using the gene­ral mecha­nism of che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence:

X → [Y]* → Y + hν

In this pro­cess, the reac­tant (or reac­tants) X leads to the for­ma­tion of an exci­ted inter­me­diate [Y]*. The exci­ted state is high-energy and the­re­fore unsta­ble. The inter­me­diate spon­ta­ne­o­u­sly converts into the final pro­duct Y, which has lower energy. The excess energy is rele­a­sed as radiant energy hν. In this case, the sub­strate X, the exci­ted inter­me­diate [Y]*, and the final pro­duct Y cor­re­spond to pero­xy­ch­lo­rate ClOO-, sin­glet oxy­gen 1O2, and tri­plet oxy­gen 3O2, respec­ti­vely.

Refe­ren­ces:

All pho­to­gra­phs and illu­stra­tions were cre­a­ted by the author.

The above text inc­lu­des minor edi­to­rial modi­fi­ca­tions com­pa­red to the ver­sion publi­shed in the jour­nal, aimed at sup­ple­men­ting and adap­ting it for online pre­sen­ta­tion.

Adden­dum

The effect of this expe­ri­ment can be seen in the fol­lo­wing video:

Marek Ples

Aa