Weird Science

M31 (M32, M101) – the Andromeda Galaxy and its satellite galaxies

Polish ver­sion is here

The Andro­meda Galaxy (M31 in the Mes­sier cata­log) is loca­ted in the con­stel­la­tion Andro­meda, named after the mytho­lo­gi­cal prin­cess, the dau­gh­ter of King Cepheus of Ethio­pia. Its distance from Earth is appro­xi­ma­tely 2.52 mil­lion light-years.

It is the lar­gest and bri­gh­test exter­nal galaxy visi­ble in the nor­thern sky. Under favo­ra­ble con­di­tions, far from the light pol­lu­tion of urban areas, its bri­gh­test cen­tral regions can often be seen with the naked eye as a small, sli­gh­tly fuzzy star or a faint patch of light. Howe­ver, to fully appre­ciate its beauty, appro­priate opti­cal equ­ip­ment is requ­i­red.

The Andro­meda Galaxy is clas­si­fied as an Sb galaxy in Hub­ble’s clas­si­fi­ca­tion or SA(s)b in the revi­sed sys­tem, mea­ning it is a spi­ral galaxy without a cen­tral bar, fea­tu­ring a medium-sized core and well-deve­lo­ped spi­ral arms. Howe­ver, scien­ti­fic reports from 2006 sug­gest that M31 may have a small bar, which would clas­sify it as SAB(s)b. Addi­tio­nally, Andro­meda is cate­go­ri­zed as a Low-Ioni­za­tion Nuc­lear Emis­sion-line Region (LINER), pla­cing it in the most com­mon group of gala­xies with active nuc­lei.

The Andro­meda Galaxy has a dense dou­ble core con­ta­i­ning at least one black hole, at least two spi­ral arms accom­pa­nied by a ring of cosmic dust which may ori­gi­nate from the smal­ler galaxy M32, and more than 450 glo­bu­lar clu­sters some of which are among the den­sest known.

Inte­re­stin­gly, 14 dwarf satel­lite gala­xies have been iden­ti­fied orbi­ting Andro­meda, the most well-known being M32 and M110.

Obse­rva­tions

August 17, 2018 – Jaworzno, Poland
urban con­di­tions, high level of light pol­lu­tion

The peak period for obse­rving mete­ors from the Per­seid meteor sho­wer is slowly coming to an end, but that doesn’t mean the night sky above our heads has become any less inte­re­sting. On the con­trary, late sum­mer and early autumn pro­vide excel­lent oppor­tu­ni­ties to obse­rve many fasci­na­ting deep-sky objects. One of them is the Andro­meda Galaxy.

The photo below were taken without the use of a tele­scope. I used an older Canon EOS 300D DSLR with a 250mm tele­photo lens. The final image is a stack of 10 expo­su­res, each with a 120-second expo­sure time, resul­ting in a total expo­sure of appro­xi­ma­tely 20 minu­tes (of course, for stac­king pur­po­ses, the requ­i­red num­ber of dark and flat fra­mes was also cap­tu­red). This was my first pho­to­graph of this object, and unfor­tu­na­tely, it is some­what blurry due to an acci­den­tal mis­fo­cus while adju­sting the camera. None­the­less, I have great sen­ti­men­tal value atta­ched to this photo.

The pho­to­graph shows the Andro­meda Galaxy, a beau­ti­ful exam­ple of a spi­ral galaxy. Its struc­tu­ral ele­ments are cle­arly visi­ble such as the bri­ght cen­tral bulge and the galac­tic disk. Dark bands within the disk mar­ked with arrows are also noti­ce­a­ble. Addi­tio­nally, two other extra­ga­lac­tic star sys­tems namely the dwarf gala­xies M32 and M110 are distinc­tly visi­ble. Both are satel­li­tes of the Andro­meda Galaxy orbi­ting aro­und it. Sli­gh­tly below is the star ν Andro­me­dae (Nu Andro­me­dae), a spec­tro­sco­pic binary star whose com­po­nents orbit their com­mon cen­ter of mass with a period of just over four Earth days.




Sep­tem­ber 5, 2019 – Jaworzno, Poland
urban con­di­tions, high level of light pol­lu­tion

Just over a year after my pre­vious attempt at pho­to­gra­phing M31, and having upgra­ded to a newer camera (Canon EOS 60D), I plan­ned ano­ther ses­sion.

As seen, the image sharp­ness is signi­fi­can­tly bet­ter, reve­a­ling more deta­ils of the galaxy’s struc­ture and the dark lanes within its spi­ral arms. The lon­ger expo­sure time hel­ped high­li­ght a gre­a­ter num­ber of deta­ils. The above pho­to­graph is crop­ped; the ori­gi­nal image is pre­sen­ted below:

The view of this distant stel­lar sys­tem, suspen­ded in an incom­pre­hen­si­bly vast cosmic void, never fails to make me pon­der the myste­ries of the uni­verse.




Sep­tem­ber 11, 2025 – Kato­wice, Poland
urban con­di­tions, very high level of light pol­lu­tion

The Andro­meda Galaxy con­ti­nues to fasci­nate and cap­ti­vate. That’s why, even after some time, I retur­ned to it with great ple­a­sure. Altho­ugh the pho­to­graph below is in black and white, it offers a much more deta­i­led view of this beau­ti­ful object than the pre­vious one (Photo 4). Achie­ving such results, despite chal­len­ging con­di­tions cau­sed by bri­ght moon­li­ght, was pos­si­ble thanks to the use of more advan­ced opti­cal instru­ments and an astro­no­mi­cal camera.

This image is a com­po­site of pho­to­gra­phs taken with two dif­fe­rent tele­sco­pes: a refrac­tor, which cap­tu­red the cen­tral region with the galaxy, and a New­to­nian reflec­tor, used to com­plete the outer areas fil­led with sur­ro­un­ding stars. I must admit, this is one of my favo­rite pho­tos.

While pre­vious obse­rva­tions have focu­sed on the Andro­meda Galaxy and its satel­lite sys­tems, this time the atten­tion turns to ano­ther intri­gu­ing object that also appe­ars in the frame.

Varia­ble stars have long intri­gued astro­no­mers. Their bri­ght­ness does not remain con­stant but fluc­tu­a­tes, some­ti­mes within seconds, some­ti­mes over the course of years. The mecha­ni­sms behind these varia­tions are as diverse as the stars them­se­lves. One par­ti­cu­larly fasci­na­ting group inc­lu­des binary sys­tems, where two gra­vi­ta­tio­nally bound stars orbit a sha­red cen­ter of mass and influ­ence each other’s evo­lu­tion. Within this group, sym­bio­tic stars are espe­cially nota­ble. These sys­tems con­sist of two stri­kin­gly dif­fe­rent com­po­nents: a cool yet still active red giant and a hot, dense com­pa­nion, most often a white dwarf. A remar­ka­ble exam­ple of such a sys­tem is HIP 3494, also known as EG Andro­me­dae, loca­ted about 2,200 light years from Earth. Its bri­ght­ness ran­ges from 11.5m to 12.3m. This is an eclip­sing binary, which means that from our per­spec­tive one star perio­di­cally pas­ses in front of the other, cau­sing noti­ce­a­ble dips in bri­ght­ness. Howe­ver, the varia­bi­lity of HIP 3494 invo­lves more than just eclip­ses.

The coo­ler and lar­ger com­po­nent of this sys­tem is a red giant nea­ring the final sta­ges of its life. Its esti­ma­ted mass falls between 1.2 and 2.4 M. At this point in its evo­lu­tion, the star has alre­ady left the main sequ­ence, under­gone signi­fi­cant expan­sion, and coo­led eno­ugh to display its cha­rac­te­ri­stic red­dish color. Its com­pa­nion is a hot and com­pact white dwarf, a typi­cal fea­ture of sym­bio­tic sys­tems. This stel­lar rem­nant, with a mass of about 0.4 M, has ended its nuc­lear fusion and con­trac­ted to a size simi­lar to that of Earth.

The geo­me­try and orbi­tal dyna­mics of HIP 3494 pro­vide impor­tant insi­ghts into how mass is trans­fer­red between the stars in the sys­tem. The two com­po­nents revo­lve aro­und a sha­red cen­ter of mass with a period of 483.5 days. This rela­ti­vely long orbi­tal period indi­ca­tes a signi­fi­cant distance between them, esti­ma­ted at appro­xi­ma­tely 1.3 AU. The orbit is nearly cir­cu­lar, with an eccen­tri­city of just 0.07, which means the distance between the stars chan­ges very lit­tle over time. This detail is par­ti­cu­larly impor­tant because it exc­lu­des Roche lobe over­flow as a likely mecha­nism for mass trans­fer. Since the red giant does not fill its Roche lobe, mat­ter must be exchan­ged thro­ugh ano­ther pro­cess.

In this case, mass is trans­fer­red thro­ugh the red giant’s stel­lar wind. At this advan­ced stage of its evo­lu­tion, an M-type star pro­du­ces strong stre­ams of gas and dust that are expel­led into sur­ro­un­ding space. The white dwarf, with its power­ful gra­vi­ta­tio­nal field, cap­tu­res some of this out­flow. Instead of fal­ling direc­tly onto the white dwarf’s sur­face, the cap­tu­red mate­rial begins to orbit it, for­ming an accre­tion disk. This pro­cess, com­mon in sym­bio­tic sys­tems, results in the rele­ase of sub­stan­tial energy.

As the gas in the disk gra­du­ally spi­rals inward, it heats up to extre­mely high tem­pe­ra­tu­res and emits strong radia­tion across various regions of the elec­tro­ma­gne­tic spec­trum. Obse­rva­tions of HIP 3494 in both ultra­vio­let and X-ray wave­leng­ths con­firm the occur­rence of these ener­ge­tic pro­ces­ses.

Photo 1 Para­me­ters:

  • Total expo­sure time: 20 minu­tes (stack of 10 RAW fra­mes at 120s each, using an appro­priate num­ber of dark, bias, and flat fra­mes)
  • Camera: Canon EOS 60D
  • ISO: 2500
  • Fake colors
  • Lens: zoom type (used at fmax = 250mm)
  • Aper­ture: f/4 (the smal­lest pos­si­ble for the lens used)
  • Mount: equ­a­to­rial mount with trac­king, ali­gned using the drift method and con­trol­led by a custom-built sys­tem

Pho­tos 2 and 3 Para­me­ters:

  • Total expo­sure time: 36 minu­tes (stack of 36 RAW fra­mes at 60s each, using an appro­priate num­ber of dark, bias, and flat fra­mes)
  • Camera: Canon EOS 60D
  • ISO: 800
  • Lens: zoom type (used at fmax = 250mm)
  • Aper­ture: f/4 (the smal­lest pos­si­ble for the lens used)
  • Mount: equ­a­to­rial mount with trac­king, ali­gned using the drift method and con­trol­led by a custom-built sys­tem

Photo 4 Para­me­ters:

  • Total expo­sure time: 260 minu­tes (stack of 130 RAW fra­mes at 120s each, using appro­priate dark, bias, and flat fra­mes)
  • Camera: ZWO ASI 662MM
  • Tele­scope 1: Ach­ro­ma­tic refrac­tor Mes­sier AR-152S (152/760), prime focus (gala­xies)
  • Tele­scope 2: New­to­nian tele­scope (150/750), prime focus (sur­ro­un­ding stars)
  • A light pol­lu­tion and atmo­sphe­ric glow reduc­tion fil­ter was used
  • Mount: Equ­a­to­rial mount with trac­king, ali­gned using the drift method and con­trol­led by a custom-built sys­tem

Marek Ples

Aa