Weird Science

M42 and M43 – The Orion Nebula, Fish's Mouth, and De Mairan's Nebula

Polish ver­sion is here

The Great Orion Nebula, also known as M42 (Mes­sier 42), is the bri­gh­test dif­fuse nebula in the night sky and can be obse­rved with the naked eye even under mode­ra­tely chal­len­ging con­di­tions. It is loca­ted in the con­stel­la­tion Orion, south of Orion’s Belt. Its distance from Earth is just over 1,300 light-years, making it the nea­rest stel­lar nur­sery to our region of the Uni­verse. The dia­me­ter of this lumi­nous cloud of cosmic gas and dust is appro­xi­ma­tely 30 light-years.

This nebula is one of the most popu­lar objects of obse­rva­tion for both ama­teur and pro­fes­sio­nal astro­no­mers. It is part of a vast com­plex of nebu­lae known as the Orion Mole­cu­lar Cloud. Within M42, pro­to­pla­ne­tary disks, brown dwarfs, tur­bu­lent flows of vast amo­unts of gas, and pho­to­io­ni­za­tion effects can be obse­rved.

The con­stel­la­tion of Orion, within which the Great Orion Nebula can be obse­rved, is one of the pro­mi­nent win­ter sky con­stel­la­tions. The pho­to­graph below, taken in my gar­den on Janu­ary 18, 2021, at 8:30 PM, shows the sou­thern part of the cele­stial sphere, fea­tu­ring Orion and its sur­ro­un­dings:

The figure of Orion was pla­ced in the sky by the ancient Gre­eks. In their mytho­logy, Orion was con­si­de­red one of the gre­a­test hun­ter­s—he could move silen­tly and even walk on water. He fell in love with the Ple­ia­des, whom he still cha­ses across the sky to this day as the star clu­ster M45. Orion met his end from the sting of a scor­pion sent by the god­dess Arte­mis. Since then, the con­stel­la­tions of Orion and Scor­pius Scor­pius lie on oppo­site sides of the sky. Even his loyal hun­ting dogs, Sirius and Pro­cyon, were pla­ced in the sky as the bri­gh­test stars of the con­stel­la­tions Canis Major (α Canis Majo­ris) and Canis Minor (α Canis Mino­ris).

Orion is a stri­king figure in the cele­stial sphere, con­ta­i­ning many bri­ght stars. Obse­rva­tions of the con­stel­la­tion are pos­si­ble even from urban areas.

Inte­re­stin­gly, in the case of Orion, the alpha star (α) is not the bri­gh­te­st—this title belongs to Beta (β), or Rigel. Alpha, the second-bri­gh­test star, is Betel­geuse, a red super­giant loca­ted about 600 light-years away. If Betel­geuse were pla­ced in the posi­tion of our Sun, its sur­face would extend rou­ghly to the orbit of Jupi­ter. As seen, the color of Betel­geuse is distinc­tly red­der than most other stars, and the star is likely nea­ring the end of its life cycle, expec­ted to explode as a super­nova in the astro­no­mi­cal future. Near Betel­geuse, in the posi­tion repre­sen­ting Orion’s other sho­ul­der, is Gamma (γ), known as Bel­la­trix. Lambda (λ) Orio­nis is a mul­ti­ple star sys­tem. Below Betel­geuse and Bel­la­trix (fur­ther south) lie the three bri­ght stars for­ming Orion’s Belt: Delta (δ), Epsi­lon (ε), and Zeta (ζ) Orio­nis, named Min­taka, Alni­lam, and Alni­tak, respec­ti­vely. Between the Belt and Beta (Rigel) and Kappa (Saiph) lies Orion’s Sword, where the Great Orion Nebula can be obse­rved even with bino­cu­lars. It is illu­mi­na­ted from within by young stars that form the Tra­pe­zium Clu­ster, desi­gna­ted as Theta (θ). Sli­gh­tly below, Iota (ι) Orio­nis, or Hatysa, can be found.

Near Orion, we can obse­rve the nor­thern regions of the con­stel­la­tion Eri­da­nus Eri­da­nus, which can never be fully visi­ble from our lati­tude. Beta of this con­stel­la­tion is Cursa, while at the oppo­site, invi­si­ble end lies Alpha, or Acher­nar. One must not for­get the Hya­de­s—this open star clu­ster is loca­ted in Tau­rus Tau­rus. Alpha Tauri, also known as Alde­ba­ran, is not part of the Hya­des. Above Orion, you can spot Tian­guan ζ Tau, which serves as a gui­de­post for loca­ting the Crab Nebula M1.

Cap­tu­ring ima­ges of the night sky no lon­ger requ­i­res spe­cia­li­zed equ­ip­ment. With pro­per tech­ni­ques, even modern smart­pho­nes can suf­fice. As evi­dence, I pre­sent Photo 2, taken on March 17, 2021, from my gar­den using a Xia­omi Redmi Note 8 Pro smart­phone equ­ip­ped with a modi­fied ver­sion of the GCam app. Along­side the raw pho­to­graph, I’ve inc­lu­ded a ver­sion anno­ta­ted based on Bayer’s Ura­no­me­tria. The full title of this work is Ura­no­me­tria: omnium aste­ri­smo­rum con­ti­nens sche­mata, nova methodo deli­ne­ata, aereis lami­nis expressa, com­ple­ted in the early 17th cen­tury. This allows us to see how the figure of Orion was ima­gi­ned in the past.

While the Orion Nebula itself can be easily spot­ted with the naked eye as a faint patch of light, more deta­i­led obse­rva­tions reveal the full beauty of this cele­stial object.

Obse­rva­tions

Janu­ary 31, 2019, aro­und 9:30 PM – Zabo­rze (Poland)
sub­ur­ban con­di­tions, mode­rate light pol­lu­tion

It was not an espe­cially cold night, with tem­pe­ra­tu­res only a few degrees below fre­e­zing. The clear, moon­less sky (a few days before the new moon) enco­u­ra­ged me to attempt some astro­pho­to­gra­phy.

The main object visi­ble in the pho­to­graph is the Great Orion Nebula, or M42. It is a nearly sphe­ri­cal cloud of gas and dust con­ta­i­ning nume­rous young stars, some of which have pro­to­pla­ne­tary disks. Under appro­priate con­di­tions, its bri­gh­test regions can be obse­rved even with the naked eye as a fuzzy, star-like patch, tho­ugh bino­cu­lars can be help­ful. Long-expo­sure pho­to­gra­phs reveal the nebula’s deli­cate pink hue, illu­mi­na­ted from within by many young stars, inc­lu­ding those within the Tra­pe­zium Clu­ster (the bri­gh­test area within the nebula). Sli­gh­tly above M42 is M43, De Mai­ran’s Nebula, which sur­ro­unds the star ν Ori. The two objects are sepa­ra­ted by a dark cloud of cosmic mate­rial known as the Fish's Mouth. Moving fur­ther upward, you enco­un­ter a com­plex of three nebu­lae: NGC 1977, NGC 1973, and NGC 1975, with the blue giant 42 Ori loca­ted within. The color of these nebu­lae is distinc­tly more blu­ish, espe­cially when com­pa­red to M42 and M43. Besi­des these nebu­lar objects, note the open clu­sters NGC 1980 and NGC 1981. The first is some­what clo­ser to the Solar Sys­tem than the other objects and inc­lu­des ι Ori, or Haty­sa—a star loca­ted at the sou­thern end of the aste­rism often refer­red to as Orion’s Sword. Using this star’s posi­tion is the easiest way to locate the other objects. NGC 1981 is loca­ted at the nor­thern end of the Sword and, due to its loo­sely spa­ced stars, is best obse­rved at low magni­fi­ca­tions.

In my opi­nion, obse­rving deep-sky ima­ges pro­vi­des a won­der­ful sense of con­nec­tion with the sur­ro­un­ding uni­verse and helps gain a bro­a­der per­spec­tive.




March 10, 2021, aro­und 8:00 PM – Jaworzno (Poland), gar­den
urban con­di­tions, high-level light pol­lu­tion

This time, I wan­ted to try pho­to­gra­phing the nebula from an urban area with a very high level of light pol­lu­tion. The result can be seen in Photo 4.

Unfor­tu­na­tely, the city’s light glow made the nebula nearly invi­si­ble. Only the use of a CLS fil­ter made prac­ti­cal obse­rva­tion pos­si­ble. This type of fil­ter blocks the wave­leng­ths of light emit­ted by mer­cury and sodium lamps (as well as other arti­fi­cial light sour­ces), which lar­gely con­tri­bute to light pol­lu­tion. Howe­ver, it allows the tran­s­mis­sion of wave­leng­ths emit­ted by many deep-sky objects: dou­bly ioni­zed oxy­gen lines (496 and 501 nm), the hydro­gen-beta line (486 nm), and the deep red hydro­gen-alpha line (656 nm). Natu­rally, using the fil­ter requ­i­red lon­ger expo­sure times, but it ena­bled much more deta­i­led visual obse­rva­tions of the nebula and its pho­to­gra­phy. The color of M42 appe­ars sli­gh­tly too red—this is likely due to the white balance set­tings, which did not match the fil­ter used. In future attempts, I plan to use a custom white balance adju­sted to the fil­ter’s cha­rac­te­ri­stics.

Photo 1 Para­me­ters:

  • Total expo­sure time: 10s (sin­gle shot)
  • Pana­so­nic dmc-fz7
  • ISO: 400
  • Mount: pho­to­gra­phic tri­pod

Photo 2 Para­me­ters:

  • Total expo­sure time: 3 minu­tes
  • Xia­omi Redmi Note 8 Pro + Gcam
  • ISO: ?
  • Mount: pho­to­gra­phic tri­pod

Photo 3 Para­me­ters:

  • Total expo­sure time: 15 minu­tes (stack of 15 RAW fra­mes at 60s each, using an appro­priate num­ber of dark, bias, and flat fra­mes)
  • Canon EOS 300D
  • ISO: 3200
  • Lens: zoom type (used at fmax = 250mm)
  • A fil­ter was used to reduce the effects of arti­fi­cial light pol­lu­tion and atmo­sphe­ric glow
  • Mount: equ­a­to­rial mount with trac­king, ali­gned using the drift method and con­trol­led by a custom-built sys­tem.

Photo 4 Para­me­ters:

  • Total expo­sure time: 48 minu­tes (stack of 34 RAW fra­mes at 85s each, using an appro­priate num­ber of dark, bias, and flat fra­mes)
  • Canon EOS 60D
  • ISO: 2000
  • Lens: zoom type (used at fmax = 250mm)
  • A fil­ter was used to reduce the effects of arti­fi­cial light pol­lu­tion and atmo­sphe­ric glow
  • Mount: equ­a­to­rial mount with trac­king, ali­gned using the drift method and con­trol­led by a custom-built sys­tem.
  • Auto­gu­i­ding

Marek Ples

Aa