Weird Science

Miniature Radio Receiver Without Integrated Circuits

Polish ver­sion is here

My fasci­na­tion with elec­tro­nics began in my early chil­dhood, and radio tech­no­logy was one of the first areas that truly cap­tu­red my atten­tion. As a natu­ral next step in nur­tu­ring this pas­sion, I deci­ded to build my own radio rece­i­ver. Ini­tially, I expe­ri­men­ted with basic detec­tor cir­cu­its con­si­sting of nothing more than a diode, a reso­nant cir­cuit, an antenna, a gro­und, and a high-impe­dance ear­piece. Altho­ugh these solu­tions had limi­ted sen­si­ti­vity and very lit­tle selec­ti­vity, wor­king on them pro­ved inva­lu­a­ble­—it spar­ked my curio­sity and moti­va­ted me to explore elec­tro­nics even fur­ther.

Today's radio tech­no­logy has rea­ched a level that allows for the con­struc­tion of minia­ture FM rece­i­vers with high-qua­lity signals and addi­tio­nal fea­tu­res, such as deco­ding RDS infor­ma­tion (eng. Radio Data Sys­tem). Some of these rece­i­vers are genu­i­nely tiny­—Photo 1 shows the RDA­5807 inte­gra­ted radio rece­i­ver mea­su­ring just 11x11x2 mm (appro­xi­ma­tely 0.43x0.43x0.08 in).

Photo 1 – RDA­5807

These rece­i­vers, thanks to modern digi­tal tech­no­lo­gies, offer high selec­ti­vity, sta­ble recep­tion, and the pos­si­bi­lity of auto­ma­tic tuning and digi­tal signal pro­ces­sing. Even so, buil­ding your own radio rece­i­ver rema­ins a valu­a­ble expe­rience for any­one inte­re­sted in radio engi­ne­e­ring and elec­tro­nics.

Without Inte­gra­ted Cir­cu­its?

Tho­ugh modern radio rece­i­vers use advan­ced digi­tal solu­tions, the fun­da­men­tal prin­ci­ples behind radio signal recep­tion remain unchan­ged, and con­struc­ting a sim­ple rece­i­ver is an excel­lent way to grasp the basic phe­no­mena in this field. That’s why I believe it’s worth buil­ding a sim­ple radio rece­i­ver on your own, even if its capa­bi­li­ties are more limi­ted than those of modern devi­ces.

The main tech­ni­cal assump­tions for my pro­po­sed design inc­lude:

A key aspect of this pro­ject is the use of a reflex cir­cuit, where the same tran­s­i­stor stage ampli­fies both the high-fre­qu­ency (RF) signal and the audio signal. This allo­wed for cir­cuit opti­mi­za­tion by redu­cing the num­ber of neces­sary com­po­nents (Figure 1), con­tri­bu­ting to a more com­pact design and sim­pli­fy­ing the mecha­ni­cal work.

Ilustracja
Figure 1 – Rece­i­ver sche­ma­tic

To build the rece­i­ver descri­bed here, you’ll need to gather the fol­lo­wing com­po­nents:

As you can see, the cir­cuit uses NPN bipo­lar tran­s­i­stors of type BC546. Altho­ugh they are gene­rally inten­ded for lower-fre­qu­ency appli­ca­tions, they per­form effec­ti­vely here. The feed­back resi­stor R3 sho­uld be cho­sen expe­ri­men­tally within the given range to get the cle­a­rest recep­tion at the lowest noise level.

The detec­tor is a cru­cial ele­ment of the rece­i­ver, as it extracts the audio signal from the high-fre­qu­ency radio signal. Here, I used a ger­ma­nium diode, AAO­152, which has a lower for­ward vol­tage than the sili­con dio­des com­monly used in modern elec­tro­nics, allo­wing it to detect wea­ker signals.

Photo 2 – Ger­ma­nium diode AAO­152

The com­po­nent in the rece­i­ver that deter­mi­nes its fre­qu­ency is the reso­nant cir­cuit, made up of coil L1 and capa­ci­tor Cr. In Poland, AM signal for I Pro­gram Pol­skiego Radia (by natio­nal public-service radio bro­ad­ca­sting orga­ni­za­tion) is bro­ad­cast at 225kHz from the Lon­gwave tran­s­mit­ter Solec Kujaw­ski. Kno­wing that the fre­qu­ency f of a paral­lel reso­nant cir­cuit is given by:

f = 1 / (2π√(L * C))

we can easily cal­cu­late the neces­sary induc­tance L once we select the capa­ci­tance C, or vice versa. For exam­ple, if f=225kHz and Cr=100pF, then L1=5mH. By kno­wing the AL value of your fer­rite core, you can deter­mine how many turns of wire you’ll need. If you don’t know this value, you can use the induc­tance meter func­tion on a mul­ti­me­ter. Instead of using a fixed-value capa­ci­tor Cr, you could also opt for a varia­ble one, allo­wing more pre­cise tuning of the rece­i­ver or the abi­lity to search for other sta­tions, even over­seas. In my case, coil L1 has 120 turns of 0.12 mm (about 0.0047 in) ena­me­led wire.

As for coil L2, which cou­ples the reso­nant cir­cuit to the detec­tor, its para­me­ters are not cri­ti­ca­l—mine is 20 turns of 0.2 mm (about 0.0079 in) ena­me­led wire.

Both coils sho­uld be wound in a sin­gle layer, turn by turn, in the same direc­tion. Paper or elec­tri­cal tape can be used as insu­la­tion between the win­dings and the core. I wound these coils on a minia­ture fer­rite rod just over 4cm (about 1.57 in) in length and 0.6cm (about 0.24 in) in dia­me­ter (Photo 3). Of course, if you’re not con­cer­ned about minia­tu­ri­za­tion, you can use a lar­ger core, which will gene­rally pro­duce bet­ter recep­tion.

Photo 3 – Fer­rite antenna with coils

I assem­bled the entire cir­cuit on a small piece of uni­ver­sal PCB, where there was also room for a jack to accom­mo­date typi­cal low-impe­dance head­pho­nes (16-32Ω), a switch, and a small 1.5V alka­line cell (Photo 4). The two ear­buds (left and right) are con­nec­ted in series.

Photo 4 – Fini­shed cir­cuit

Once the cir­cuit is powe­red, you sho­uld hear a gen­tle his­sing noise in the head­pho­nes, and tuning to the sta­tion sho­uld pro­duce a loud and clear bro­ad­cast. If the noise level is exces­sive, try adju­sting R3. Bear in mind that the fer­rite antenna has a direc­tio­nal cha­rac­te­ri­stic, so for best results, rotate it accor­ding to the direc­tion of the bro­ad­ca­sting sta­tion. The whole device easily fits inside a match­box (Photo 5).

Photo 5 – Com­pa­red to a match­box

To test the device’s func­tio­na­lity, I ana­ly­zed its per­for­mance under various envi­ron­men­tal con­di­tions. In open spa­ces, the signal was clear and sta­ble, while in enc­lo­sed areas there was noti­ce­a­ble inter­fe­rence from elec­tro­nic devi­ces such as com­pu­ters, cell pho­nes, or LCD moni­tors. Of course, you can still use the rece­i­ver indo­ors; just keep it away from inter­fe­rence sour­ces.

To demon­strate the sound qua­lity you can expect from a pro­perly built and tuned rece­i­ver, here is a recor­ding of a bro­ad­cast:

I recor­ded the audio by pla­cing a micro­phone aga­inst the ear­phone con­nec­ted to the rece­i­ver.

Even buil­ding a rece­i­ver as sim­ple as this one is a great way to become fasci­na­ted with and dee­pen your know­ledge of radio engi­ne­e­ring and ana­log elec­tro­nics. In a world domi­na­ted by digi­tal devi­ces, it’s wor­th­while to return to the basics, and there is immense satis­fac­tion in pic­king up radio bro­ad­ca­sts on a device you’ve built your­self.

Fur­ther rea­dings:

Marek Ples

Aa