Weird Science

Photosynthesis in a Test Tube

Polish ver­sion is here

The fol­lo­wing article was ori­gi­nally publi­shed in the jour­nal for edu­ca­tors Bio­lo­gia w Szkole (Bio­logy in School) (6/2018):

Ilustracja

Ples M., Foto­syn­teza w pro­bówce (eng. Pho­to­syn­the­sis in a Test Tube), Bio­lo­gia w Szkole (Bio­logy in School), 6 (2018), Forum Media Pol­ska Sp. z o.o., pp. 57-63

Pho­to­syn­the­sis can be defi­ned as a pro­cess that ena­bles the pro­duc­tion of orga­nic com­po­unds from inor­ga­nic mat­ter. It occurs with the help of light in cells con­ta­i­ning chlo­ro­phyll or bac­te­rio­ch­lo­ro­phyll [1].

Among the bio­che­mi­cal pro­ces­ses known to us, pho­to­syn­the­sis holds one of the most impor­tant pla­ces, not only from an aca­de­mic per­spec­tive. It is worth noting that almost all energy ava­i­la­ble to life come­s—di­rec­tly or indi­rec­tly­—from the Sun and rea­ches us lar­gely as elec­tro­ma­gne­tic radia­tion in the visi­ble spec­trum. Pho­to­syn­the­sis allows auto­tro­phic orga­ni­sms to convert light into che­mi­cal bond energy in orga­nic com­po­unds, which is then used by the orga­ni­sms them­se­lves and by hete­ro­tro­phic orga­ni­sms. In this way, when con­si­de­ring Earth as a whole, the mass of orga­nic mat­ter incre­a­ses. This occurs, of course, at the expense of inor­ga­nic mat­ter. The high con­cen­tra­tion of oxy­gen in our pla­net’s atmo­sphere is also the result of mil­lions of years of pho­to­syn­the­sis car­ried out by various orga­ni­sms.

It sho­uld be empha­si­zed that there is also an older evo­lu­tio­nary mecha­nism of auto­tro­phy that does not requ­ire sun­li­ght. This is che­mo­syn­the­sis, in which energy is gene­ra­ted thro­ugh the oxi­da­tion of sim­ple inor­ga­nic com­po­unds or methane [2]. Che­mo­tro­phic orga­ni­sms inc­lude cer­tain bac­te­ria, such as nitri­fy­ing bac­te­ria from the genera Nitro­so­mo­nas and Nitro­bac­ter, sul­fur bac­te­ria Beg­gia­toa, iron bac­te­ria Lep­to­spi­ril­lum, hydro­gen bac­te­ria Hydro­ge­no­bac­ter, and others [3]. Che­mo­tro­phic orga­ni­sms play an impor­tant role in the nitro­gen and pho­spho­rus cyc­les. Howe­ver, from the stand­po­int of bio­mass pro­duc­tion, the role of this type of meta­bo­lic pro­cess is smal­ler than that of pho­to­syn­the­sis.

This article will pri­ma­rily focus on pho­to­syn­the­sis in euka­ry­o­tic orga­ni­sms, i.e., those whose cells con­tain spe­cia­li­zed orga­nel­les. In these orga­ni­sms (e.g., green plants Chlo­ro­pla­stida), the pro­cess of pho­to­syn­the­sis takes place in spe­ci­fic struc­tu­re­s—ch­lo­ro­pla­sts con­ta­i­ning pho­to­syn­the­tic pig­ments, mainly chlo­ro­phylls. In plants, chlo­ro­pla­sts are most abun­dant in the cells of lea­ves, which are the main organs invo­lved in car­bon dio­xide assi­mi­la­tion. A smal­ler num­ber of chlo­ro­pla­sts are also found in other non-woody tis­sues.

Pho­to­syn­the­sis is, of course, a very com­plex pro­cess, but cer­tain mecha­ni­sms of it can be stu­died even with mini­mal reso­ur­ces and time. One of the help­ful tools for this pur­pose is the so-cal­led Hill reac­tion, named after Bri­tish bio­che­mist Robert Hill, who descri­bed this reac­tion in 1939 [4]. It allows for pho­to­syn­the­sis in vitro, in iso­la­ted chlo­ro­pla­sts.

We can per­form two varia­tions of the Hill reac­tion. The first is more visu­ally stri­king but requ­i­res sli­gh­tly har­der-to-obtain sub­stan­ces. The second, on the other hand, can be con­duc­ted using rela­ti­vely easily acces­si­ble che­mi­cal com­po­unds.

Iso­la­tion of Chlo­ro­pla­sts

To con­duct the expe­ri­ment, we need to obtain chlo­ro­pla­sts. For this pur­pose, any green, non-woody parts of plants will work, espe­cially lea­ves. Fresh spi­nach lea­ves Spi­na­cia ole­ra­cea from the Ama­ran­tha­ceae family are par­ti­cu­larly sui­ta­ble. This plant is valued as a rich source of vita­mins, pro­te­ins, fiber, caro­te­no­ids, and mine­ral salts. An impor­tant advan­tage of spi­nach is its low cul­ti­va­tion cost and—par­ti­cu­larly bene­fi­cial for us as expe­ri­men­ter­s—its ava­i­la­bi­lity thro­u­ghout the year, even when fresh edi­ble plants are scarce [5].

For the expe­ri­ment, only a small amo­unt of spi­nach lea­ves (a few to seve­ral) is nee­ded (Photo 1). Unlike, for exam­ple, chlo­ro­phyll extrac­tion, fro­zen spi­nach can­not be use­d—only fresh spi­nach is sui­ta­ble [6].

Photo 1 – Spi­nach lea­ves used in the expe­ri­ment

For the best results, all chlo­ro­plast iso­la­tion pro­ce­du­res sho­uld be car­ried out in the dark or under mini­mal ligh­ting. The pre­pa­red iso­late sho­uld also be sto­red under dark con­di­tions. This pre­vents damage to the chlo­ro­pla­sts.

The lea­ves sho­uld be cut into small pie­ces, pla­ced in a chil­led por­ce­lain mor­tar, and a small amo­unt of pure quartz sand (or finely gro­und, tho­ro­u­ghly cle­a­ned regu­lar sand) sho­uld be added, as shown in Photo 2.

Photo 2 – Pie­ces of spi­nach lea­ves with sand in the mor­tar

Chlo­ro­pla­sts are extrac­ted using an iso­la­tion solu­tion, which pro­tects these deli­cate orga­nel­les from damage. To pre­pare it, we need the fol­lo­wing sub­stan­ces:

We are not using any highly toxic sub­stan­ces here, but cau­tion sho­uld always be exer­ci­sed when han­dling che­mi­cals. This applies to all sub­stan­ces used in sub­se­qu­ent sta­ges of the expe­ri­ments descri­bed in this article.

All solu­tions sho­uld be pre­pa­red using distil­led water.

The pho­sphate buf­fer can be obta­i­ned by wei­ghing:

These sho­uld then be dis­so­lved in water so that the final volume is 1dm3 (33.8 fl. oz.) [7]. It is best to check the pH of the solu­tion and, if neces­sary, adjust the amo­unts of sub­stan­ces used or add a small amo­unt of acid or base to achieve a pH as close as pos­si­ble to the desi­red value.

Next, to pre­pare the iso­la­tion solu­tion, dis­so­lve 136.92g (4.83 oz) of sucrose and 0.75g (0.026 oz) of potas­sium chlo­ride in the pre­vio­u­sly pre­pa­red pho­sphate buf­fer, so that the final volume again equ­als 1dm3 (33.8 fl. oz.). The solu­tion can be sto­red in an air­ti­ght con­ta­i­ner in the refri­ge­ra­tor for some time.

The pre­pa­red, pre-cut spi­nach lea­ves with sand sho­uld be cove­red in the mor­tar with seve­ral cubic cen­ti­me­ters of the chil­led iso­la­tion solu­tion and then gro­und (Photo 3).

Photo 3 – Eve­ry­thing ready for grin­ding

The sand helps break open the cells (espe­cially their cell walls) and rele­a­ses chlo­ro­pla­sts. Grin­ding sho­uld not be car­ried out for too long. The cold mixture sho­uld then be fil­te­red thro­ugh gauze to remove lar­ger cell frag­ments. Chlo­ro­pla­sts pass thro­ugh the fil­ter and remain intact due to the pro­tec­tive envi­ron­ment pro­vi­ded by the iso­la­tion solu­tion.

The resul­ting liquid sho­uld be coo­led, for instance, in an ice bath (Photo 4). The green chlo­ro­plast suspen­sion sho­uld be sto­red in a dark refri­ge­ra­tor until fur­ther pro­ces­sing.

Photo 4 – Suspen­sion of iso­la­ted chlo­ro­pla­sts

If pos­si­ble, the chlo­ro­plast suspen­sion can be con­cen­tra­ted by cen­tri­fu­ga­tion, and the resul­ting pel­let can be resu­spen­ded in fresh iso­la­tion buf­fer.

Chlo­ro­plast suspen­sion sho­uld not be sto­red for long, so it is best to pro­ceed with fur­ther expe­ri­ments imme­dia­tely or shor­tly after iso­la­tion.

Arti­fi­cial Pho­to­syn­the­sis – Ver­sion I

In this expe­ri­ment, we will use 2,6-dich­lo­ro­phe­no­lin­do­phe­nol C12H7NCl2O2 (Fig. 1).

Ilustracja
Fig. 1 – Struc­tu­ral for­mula of 2,6-dich­lo­ro­phe­no­lin­do­phe­nol

This com­po­und is used as a redox indi­ca­tor. Its oxi­di­zed form is blue, while the redu­ced form is color­less. This sub­stance is also used to deter­mine the con­cen­tra­tion of ascor­bic acid C26H8O6 (vita­min C) in pla­sma [8].

To con­duct the expe­ri­ment, place 5.8 cm3 of the chlo­ro­plast suspen­sion into two test tubes or other ves­sels, and add 0.2 cm3 of a 0.1% solu­tion of 2,6-dich­lo­ro­phe­no­lin­do­phe­nol in the same pho­sphate buf­fer used to pre­pare the iso­la­tion solu­tion. If the chlo­ro­plast con­cen­tra­tion is too high, expe­ri­ment with dilu­ting the suspen­sion.

At this stage, both sam­ples sho­uld be dark blue (Photo 5).

Photo 5 – Pre­pa­red sam­ples

One of the test tubes sho­uld then be expo­sed to light. Sun­li­ght is best for this pur­pose, but arti­fi­cial light can be used if neces­sary. It is impor­tant, howe­ver, that the bulb does not over­heat the reac­tion setup. The other test tube sho­uld be kept com­ple­tely pro­tec­ted from light – for exam­ple, by wrap­ping it in alu­mi­num foil.

It is worth obse­rving the sam­ple expo­sed to sun­li­ght in real-time. The effect is shown in Photo 6.

Photo 6 – Effect of sun­li­ght on the sam­ple; A – 0 min. (at the moment of expo­sure to sun­li­ght), B – 2 min., C – 4 min., D – 6 min., E – 8 min., F – 10 min.

As can be seen, after expo­sure to light, the blue color of the 2,6-dich­lo­ro­phe­no­lin­do­phe­nol disap­pe­ars quite quic­kly, allo­wing the green color of the chlo­ro­phyll in the chlo­ro­pla­sts to be obse­rved again.

After the color disap­pe­ars in the expo­sed sam­ple, it sho­uld be com­pa­red with the one kept in the dark (Photo 7).

Photo 7 – Expe­ri­ment result; left – sam­ple expo­sed to light, right – sam­ple kept in the dark

We can obse­rve that only the sam­ple expo­sed to sun­li­ght has lost its color. The­re­fore, it can be conc­lu­ded that the color change occurs in response to light.

The reac­tion pre­sen­ted here is inte­re­sting, and its effect is cle­arly visi­ble. Howe­ver, I rea­lize that the redox indi­ca­tor used in it may be dif­fi­cult to obtain, so below I pre­sent a sim­pli­fied ver­sion using more acces­si­ble sub­stan­ces.

Arti­fi­cial Pho­to­syn­the­sis – Ver­sion II

In this case, instead of 2,6-dich­lo­ro­phe­no­lin­do­phe­nol, we will use potas­sium hexa­cy­a­no­fer­rate(III) K3[Fe(CN)6]. This is a com­plex com­po­und, so the anion in it con­si­sts of iron(III) Fe3+ along with six cya­nide gro­ups CN-. The struc­ture of this anion is shown in Fig. 2.

Ilustracja
Fig. 2 – Anion of hexa­cy­a­no­fer­rate(III)

Loo­king at the che­mi­cal for­mu­las alone, this com­po­und is easily con­fu­sed with potas­sium hexa­cy­a­no­fer­rate(II) K4[Fe(CN)6]. For­tu­na­tely, both sub­stan­ces can be distin­gu­i­shed by the naked eye, because while hexa­cy­a­no­fer­rate(II) is yel­low, the requ­i­red hexa­cy­a­no­fer­rate(III) forms beau­ti­ful red cry­stals (Photo 8).

Photo 8 – Cry­stals of potas­sium hexa­cy­a­no­fer­rate(III)

War­ning: Potas­sium hexa­cy­a­no­fer­rate(III) itself is not toxic, but when it comes into con­tact with acids, it can rele­ase highly toxic gases such as hydro­gen cya­nide HCN! This sho­uld be kept in mind when cle­a­ning up after the expe­ri­ment.

We need a very dilu­ted solu­tion of the salt discus­sed above. To 100 cm3 of water, just add a few cry­stals of hexa­cy­a­no­fer­rate(III), about the size of poppy seeds, to achieve the requ­i­red con­cen­tra­tion. This solu­tion has a yel­low-orange color (Photo 9).

Photo 9 – Solu­tion of potas­sium hexa­cy­a­no­fer­rate(III)

Next, we pro­ceed simi­larly to the pre­vious ver­sion of the expe­ri­ment, i.e., trans­fer a few cubic cen­ti­me­ters of the chlo­ro­plast suspen­sion into two test tubes, then add a small volume of the hexa­cy­a­no­fer­rate(III) solu­tion and mix. One of the test tubes is pla­ced in the dark (e.g., by wrap­ping it in alu­mi­num foil), while the other is expo­sed to light (Photo 10).

Photo 10 – Sam­ples of chlo­ro­plast suspen­sion with added com­plex salt

Note that the very dilu­ted salt solu­tion did not affect the color of the sam­ple.

The effect of the expe­ri­ment can be seen in Photo 11. The con­trol sam­ple of chlo­ro­plast suspen­sion without the added com­plex salt was also expo­sed to light, but even after seve­ral hours of expo­sure, no major chan­ges were obse­rved (Photo 11A). Howe­ver, in this case, a small amo­unt of gas bub­bles might occa­sio­nally be obse­rved.

Sam­ples con­ta­i­ning the com­plex salt look sli­gh­tly dif­fe­rent. In both cases, nor­mal floc­cu­lent pre­ci­pi­ta­tion of the iso­la­ted chlo­ro­pla­sts occur­red – this phe­no­me­non may be cau­sed by using too con­cen­tra­ted a buf­fer solu­tion, but it usu­ally does not inter­fere with obse­rva­tions (if neces­sary, the con­cen­tra­tions can be expe­ri­men­tally adju­sted). In the sam­ple expo­sed to light, after a few minu­tes, a con­si­de­ra­ble amo­unt of gas can be seen being rele­a­sed, for­ming easily visi­ble bub­bles (Photo 11B). The sam­ple kept in the dark shows no signs of gas rele­ase (Photo 11C).

Photo 11 – Expe­ri­ment result; A – sam­ple without hexa­cy­a­no­fer­rate(III) (expo­sed to light), B – sam­ple with hexa­cy­a­no­fer­rate(III) (expo­sed to light), C – sam­ple with hexa­cy­a­no­fer­rate(III) (kept in the dark)

By sea­ling test tube B with a stop­per and a fle­xi­ble tube, the rele­a­sed gas can be col­lec­ted, pre­fe­ra­bly by displa­cing water from ano­ther test tube. A glo­wing splint test allows for iden­ti­fi­ca­tion – the wood igni­tes bri­gh­tly, con­fir­ming that the gas is oxy­gen.

Expla­na­tion

Chlo­ro­pla­sts, as auto­no­mous orga­nel­les, are sur­ro­un­ded by two mem­bra­nes, which pro­tect the stroma inside. They also con­tain their own gene­tic mate­rial in the form of a clo­sed cir­cu­lar strand. The outer mem­brane is per­me­a­ble to ions, while the inner mem­brane is less per­me­a­ble and forms nume­rous struc­tu­res cal­led thy­la­ko­ids, which are arran­ged in flat stacks (grana).

Pho­to­syn­the­sis can be divi­ded into two sta­ges: the light phase and the dark phase.

The light phase takes place in the thy­la­koid mem­bra­nes and, as the name sug­ge­sts, requ­i­res light. Its pur­pose is to convert the radiant energy of visi­ble light into the energy of che­mi­cal bonds: ade­no­sine-5′-tri­pho­sphate C10H16N5O13P3 (ATP) and redu­ced nico­ti­na­mide ade­nine dinuc­le­o­tide pho­sphate C21H27N7O14P2 (NADPH).

The light energy is used to trans­fer elec­trons from water mole­cu­les. The enzyme com­plex that bre­aks down water (the Oxy­gen Evo­lving Com­plex, OEC) con­ta­ins man­ga­nese and cal­cium ions. The elec­trons obta­i­ned in this way are tran­s­por­ted thro­ugh a multi-step sys­tem of spe­cia­li­zed car­riers to the oxi­di­zed form of NADP+, where they are accep­ted, for­ming NADPH. Elec­tron tran­s­port invo­lves pro­tein-lipid-pig­ment com­ple­xes per­ma­nen­tly bound to the mem­brane: pho­to­sy­s­tem I (PS I, wor­king most effi­cien­tly at a wave­length of 700 nm), pho­to­sy­s­tem II (PS II, maxi­mum effi­ciency at 680 nm), and the cyto­ch­rome b6f com­plex. Also invo­lved are mobile elec­tron car­riers: pla­sto­qu­i­none C53H80O2 and the small cop­per-con­ta­i­ning pro­tein pla­sto­cy­a­nin.

These pro­ces­ses simul­ta­ne­o­u­sly cre­ate a tran­s­mem­brane pro­ton gra­dient, which is used as the dri­ving force for the ATP syn­thase enzyme, pro­du­cing ATP from ade­no­sine-5′-dipho­sphate C10H15N5O10P2 (ADP) and pho­sphate gro­ups.

The role of pho­to­syn­the­tic pig­ments is pri­ma­rily played by chlo­ro­phyll com­po­unds. Their abi­lity to be exci­ted by absor­bing light energy can be easily demon­stra­ted by illu­mi­na­ting an ace­tone extract of chlo­ro­phylls with high-energy light, such as ultra­vio­let. The exci­ta­tion energy is then rele­a­sed to the envi­ron­ment as light of a beau­ti­ful red color (Photo 12).

Photo 12 – Flu­o­re­scence of chlo­ro­phyll after being illu­mi­na­ted with a blue semi­con­duc­tor laser

The dark phase of pho­to­syn­the­sis does not requ­ire light. It is also cal­led the Calvin-Ben­son cycle and takes place in the stroma of chlo­ro­pla­sts. The energy sto­red in the form of high-energy che­mi­cal com­po­unds ATP and NADPH is used to convert car­bon dio­xide CO2 into sim­ple orga­nic com­po­unds. This occurs by adding car­bon dio­xide to ribu­lose-1,5-bispho­sphate C5H12O11P2. During fur­ther trans­for­ma­tions, 3-pho­spho­gly­ce­ral­de­hyde C3H7O6P is pro­du­ced, which even­tu­ally beco­mes glu­cose, the final pro­duct. At the same time, ribu­lose-1,5-bispho­sphate is rege­ne­ra­ted, neces­sary for bin­ding addi­tio­nal car­bon dio­xide mole­cu­les and com­ple­ting the cycle [9].

It is worth noting that the light phase of pho­to­syn­the­sis would not be pos­si­ble without the pre­sence of the final elec­tron accep­tor from the water mole­cu­les. Under phy­sio­lo­gi­cal con­di­tions, this role is played by NADP, which is redu­ced to NADPH.

In the Hill reac­tion, iso­la­ted chlo­ro­pla­sts carry out pho­to­syn­the­sis in the pre­sence of an arti­fi­cial elec­tron accep­tor, such as 2,6-dich­lo­ro­phe­no­lin­do­phe­nol. In this case, the trans­fer of elec­trons to its mole­cu­les (i.e., reduc­tion) cau­ses the color of the solu­tion to disap­pear. Thus, we are dea­ling with a multi-step redox reac­tion, some of the steps of which are powe­red by light.

In the second ver­sion of the expe­ri­ment, the arti­fi­cial elec­tron accep­tor is the com­plex ion hexa­cy­a­no­fer­rate(III) [Fe(CN)6]3-, which is redu­ced to hexa­cy­a­no­fer­rate(II) [Fe(CN)6]4-. Altho­ugh no color change was obse­rved here, remem­ber where the trans­fer­red elec­trons come from. They are strip­ped from water, which results in the for­ma­tion of oxy­gen mole­cu­les O2, as obse­rved [10].

The Hill reac­tion demon­stra­tes that the oxy­gen rele­a­sed during pho­to­syn­the­sis does not come from assi­mi­la­ted car­bon dio­xide but from the water being split, because the disco­lo­ra­tion of 2,6-dich­lo­ro­phe­no­lin­do­phe­nol occurs even in the absence of car­bon dio­xide. The­re­fore, chlo­ro­pla­sts in such con­di­tions are still capa­ble of split­ting water, rele­a­sing oxy­gen, and redu­cing natu­ral or arti­fi­cial elec­tron accep­tors, but they can­not pro­duce glu­cose.

In this rela­ti­vely sim­ple way, we have delved into the mole­cu­lar foun­da­tions of the cru­cial pro­cess of life, known as pho­to­syn­the­sis.

Refe­ren­ces:

All pho­to­gra­phs and illu­stra­tions were cre­a­ted by the author.

This text has under­gone sli­ght edi­to­rial modi­fi­ca­tions com­pa­red to the ver­sion publi­shed in the jour­nal to bet­ter suit online pre­sen­ta­tion.

Marek Ples

Aa