Weird Science

Retro Science Strikes Back: Detecting Lightning with a Coherer

Polish ver­sion is here

Back to the Roots of Radio

When it comes to the deve­lop­ment of wire­less com­mu­ni­ca­tion, along­side Tesla and Mar­coni, we also owe much to Ale­xan­der Popov.

Ilustracja

Source: http://upload.wiki­me­dia.org/wiki­pe­dia/com­mons/a/a8/Ale­xan­der_Ste­pa­no­vich_Popov.jpg, acces­sed: 12/18/2011

Popov was a Rus­sian scien­tist who gra­du­a­ted in phy­sics from St. Peters­burg Uni­ver­sity. At the end of the 19th cen­tury and the start of the 20th cen­tury, he was one of the first to explore the idea of long-distance wire­less com­mu­ni­ca­tion. In 1894, he built a light­ning detec­tor that was essen­tially one of the first radio rece­i­vers. Between 1895 and 1897, he inde­pen­den­tly deve­lo­ped a wire­less tele­graph sys­tem, simi­lar to Guglielmo Mar­coni's, and in 1897, he suc­cess­fully tran­s­mit­ted radio signals over a distance of 5 kilo­me­ters (3.1 miles).

In his expe­ri­ments, Popov fre­qu­en­tly used a device known as a cohe­rer, which we will now exa­mine in more detail.

The Cohe­rer

The cohe­rer is a remar­ka­bly sim­ple yet sur­pri­sin­gly effec­tive detec­tor of elec­tro­ma­gne­tic waves. Its low selec­ti­vity was not a draw­back during the early days of radio deve­lop­ment.

Its con­struc­tion is as fol­lows:

Ilustracja

It con­si­sts of a glass tube with elec­tro­des pla­ced inside. Between the elec­tro­des are loo­sely pac­ked metal filings, typi­cally made of steel or brass. You can adjust the inser­tion depth of the elec­tro­des to fine-tune per­for­mance.

My cohe­rer:

Of course, obta­i­ning an ori­gi­nal cohe­rer today is quite chal­len­ging. Howe­ver, you can build one your­self using metal filings obta­i­ned from filing steel parts. Instead of a glass tube, a pla­stic one can be used, and the elec­tro­des can be repla­ced with nail heads.

The cohe­rer works on the prin­ci­ple that the loo­sely pac­ked metal filings pro­vide high elec­tri­cal resi­stance between the elec­tro­des. Howe­ver, a suf­fi­cien­tly strong pulse of elec­tro­ma­gne­tic radia­tion cau­ses the filings to rear­range and some­ti­mes even form micro­sco­pic welds due to micro-dischar­ges. As a result, the resi­stance of the cohe­rer drops signi­fi­can­tly. It can be resto­red to its ori­gi­nal state by sha­king the device. In more auto­ma­ted appli­ca­tions, the acti­va­ted cohe­rer would trig­ger a bell, whose ham­mer would shake the cohe­rer, reset­ting it to its standby state.

With the cohe­rer ready, you can attempt to build Popov’s first light­ning detec­tor. The sche­ma­tic is shown below:

Ilustracja

The antenna must be rela­ti­vely long: at least 10 meters (32.8 feet) of wire suspen­ded at a hei­ght of no less than 6 meters (19.7 feet). The gro­un­ding must also be of good qua­lity. This device can detect thun­der­storms with light­ning stri­kes from a distance of over 25 kilo­me­ters (15.5 miles). A light­ning bolt, being a power­ful elec­tric spark, gene­ra­tes an elec­tro­ma­gne­tic pulse that is rece­i­ved by the antenna and tran­s­mit­ted to the cohe­rer, cau­sing its resi­stance to drop. This clo­ses the cir­cuit, and the out­put com­po­nent (a bulb or bell) indi­ca­tes the occur­rence of a light­ning strike. To detect sub­se­qu­ent stri­kes, the cohe­rer must be sha­ken to reset it.

War­ning: In the event of nearby light­ning stri­kes, it is essen­tial to remove or gro­und the antenna, as lea­ving it con­nec­ted during a storm can be extre­mely dan­ge­rous.

You can also test the light­ning detec­tor on a smal­ler scale: instead of an antenna, use a wire seg­ment a few cen­ti­me­ters (about an inch or two) long and cre­ate elec­tric dischar­ges nearby using a  Ruhm­korff coil. A spark discharge near the device will trig­ger the detec­tor.

Enjoy expe­ri­men­ting with this fasci­na­ting and edu­ca­tio­nal device! :)

Fur­ther rea­dings:

Marek Ples

Aa