Weird Science

The Chemist on the Case – Chemiluminescence Activated by Blood

Polish ver­sion is here

Inve­sti­ga­tion

Many sub­stan­ces exhi­bit che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence, inc­lu­ding luci­fe­rin with luci­fe­rase, white pho­spho­rus, sin­glet oxy­gen, lophine, or the pyro­gal­lol-for­mal­de­hyde sys­tem. The stron­gest lumi­ne­scence is pro­du­ced by lumi­nol oxi­di­zed in an alka­line envi­ron­ment. The lumi­ne­scence of oxi­di­zed lumi­nol can be trig­ge­red by the pre­sence of blood, a phe­no­me­non com­monly used for its detec­tion.

Take a look at the piece of fil­ter paper shown below:

The paper appe­ars clean; in today's expe­ri­ment, we will deter­mine whe­ther any tra­ces of blood were left on it.

What Do We Need?

We need to gather the sub­stan­ces listed below.

War­ning: This expe­ri­ment invo­lves NaOH, a strong base with highly cor­ro­sive pro­per­ties. Per­hy­drol is also cor­ro­sive and can cause necro­tic damage upon skin con­tact. Lumi­nol is an aller­gen and is suspec­ted of being car­ci­no­ge­nic! Avoid any con­tact with the eyes or skin! The use of blood of unk­nown ori­gin may pose an infec­tion risk for cer­tain dise­a­ses, so extreme cau­tion is requ­i­red! Pro­tec­tive glo­ves and safety gog­gles are man­da­tory! The author assu­mes no respon­si­bi­lity for any damage that may result. You per­form this expe­ri­ment at your own risk!

3-Ami­no­ph­tha­lic hydra­zide, more com­monly known as lumi­nol, is a rela­ti­vely expen­sive rea­gent com­pa­red to more com­monly used labo­ra­tory che­mi­cals like hydro­gen pero­xide or sodium hydro­xide. For­tu­na­tely, only very small amo­unts are nee­ded, so even 0.5 g (0.018 oz) of this sub­stance is eno­ugh for many fasci­na­ting reac­tions. Its struc­tu­ral for­mula:

Ilustracja

It is also pos­si­ble to syn­the­size lumi­nol inde­pen­den­tly, altho­ugh this requ­i­res some effort. Howe­ver, for those who are deter­mi­ned, nothing is too dif­fi­cult! For those inte­re­sted in syn­the­si­zing this sub­stance on their own, I have pro­vi­ded a descrip­tion of my lumi­nol syn­the­sis. Below is an image of a sam­ple obta­i­ned using this method, which was also used in this expe­ri­ment.

Once we have gathe­red all the neces­sary com­po­nents, we can pro­ceed with the ana­ly­sis.

Expe­ri­ment

We need to pre­pare the appro­priate solu­tion. Dis­so­lve 1 g (0.035 oz) of NaOH in 50 cm3 (1.69 fl oz) of distil­led water, then add a few mil­li­grams (a frac­tion of an ounce) of lumi­nol (this small amo­unt is suf­fi­cient; there is no need to use more). Lumi­nol dis­so­lves rather slowly in water, so con­ti­nu­ous stir­ring is requ­i­red until it fully dis­so­lves. A magne­tic stir­rer can be very use­ful for this pur­pose. The pre­pa­red solu­tion is sta­ble and can be sto­red for future use.

Next, cut the mate­rial to be ana­ly­zed into small frag­ments:

Just before ana­ly­sis, add 1.5 cm3 (0.05 fl oz) of per­hy­drol to the solu­tion. Pour about 5 cm3 (0.17 fl oz) of the pre­pa­red solu­tion into a test tube, then drop in one frag­ment of the mate­rial and stir.

As a result of these steps, the solu­tion begins to glow with a faint but cle­arly visi­ble blue light.

The lumi­ne­scence con­firms that blood was indeed pre­sent on the paper.

Expla­na­tion

We have detec­ted blood on the paper. But how did it get there? In this case, there was no crime invo­lve­d—ra­ther, it demon­stra­tes that science some­ti­mes requ­i­res small sacri­fi­ces. I acci­den­tally inju­red myself while pre­pa­ring for ano­ther expe­ri­ment, and after dres­sing the wound and stop­ping the ble­e­ding, I wiped my skin with a ste­rile fil­ter paper. There was no visi­ble trace of blood, but as it turns out, an extre­mely small amo­unt must have trans­fer­red onto the paper. This method is capa­ble of detec­ting even com­ple­tely invi­si­ble or aged blood tra­ces. It is, in fact, widely used in foren­sic science.

The mecha­nism of the reac­tion is based on the oxi­da­tion of lumi­nol in an alka­line envi­ron­ment using H2O2 in the pre­sence of a cata­lyst. A deta­i­led expla­na­tion of this pro­cess can be found here. The reac­tion can be cata­ly­zed by com­plex com­po­unds of cop­per or iron. In other expe­ri­ments, potas­sium fer­ri­cy­a­nide K3[Fe(CN)6] is used as a trig­ger, but for obvious rea­sons, it is not pre­sent in blood. So, how does blood cata­lyze the oxi­da­tion of lumi­nol and cause its glow?

The key fac­tor here is the red blood pig­men­t—he­mo­glo­bin. Hemo­glo­bin con­si­sts of a pro­tein com­po­nent, glo­bin, and a pro­sthe­tic non-pro­tein ele­ment, heme. The orga­nic part of heme has a struc­ture ana­lo­gous to por­phy­rin. In the heme mole­cule, a spe­ci­fic por­phy­rin binds an iron ion (Fe2+ or Fe3+) thro­ugh four iron-nitro­gen bonds. For­mally, two of these are cova­lent bonds and two are coor­di­nate bonds, altho­ugh in prac­tice, they are equ­i­va­lent. The struc­tu­ral for­mula of heme:

Ilustracja

Due to its iron in a com­ple­xed form, heme exhi­bits cata­ly­tic pro­per­ties that pro­mote the oxi­da­tion of lumi­nol by H2O2. This pro­cess results in the emis­sion of cha­rac­te­ri­stic blue che­mi­lu­mi­ne­scence, which can assist in blood detec­tion.

It is impor­tant to note that simi­lar reac­tions can be trig­ge­red by spe­ci­fic plant enzy­mes, par­ti­cu­larly pero­xi­da­ses. To rule out false posi­ti­ves cau­sed by these enzy­mes, the test sam­ple sho­uld be hea­ted for a few minu­tes at a mini­mum of 100°C (212°F). High tem­pe­ra­tu­res deac­ti­vate enzy­mes, ensu­ring that any rema­i­ning lumi­ne­scence can be attri­bu­ted solely to the pre­sence of blood.

Marek Ples

Aa