The Common Rough Woodlouse in a Choice Chamber: Animal Experiments
Polish version is here |
The following article was originally published in the journal for educators Biologia w Szkole (eng. Biology in School) (2/2021):

Biology, like all natural sciences, relies on hands‑on experimentation. In school or university labs, however, setting up observations with live animals often proves challenging. Maintaining cultures is regulated by strict guidelines and can be a burden. One practical workaround is to use familiar household species. While hamsters, mice, and rats are classic choices for maze‑based behavior studies, cats or dogs would be impractical.
Any animal experiments — or their use in education — must be approved by the appropriate ethics committee, especially if they may cause pain or stress. Current legislation in Poland covers vertebrates and the most complex invertebrates (i.e., cephalopods Cephalopoda), but not other invertebrates. I urge you to check the latest regulations. Even where approval isn’t needed, we must never tolerate unnecessary cruelty to any animal.
In a previous article, I described a maze experiment with terrestrial isopods (Photo.1) [1] [2].
Since our woodlouse cooperated so well, I’ve designed new trials featuring the same species.
About the woodlouse
Woodlice of the genus Porcellio are often mistaken for insects Insecta but are actually terrestrial crustaceans Crustacea in the order Isopoda. Unlike most crustaceans, they live entirely on land, preferring damp habitats. Both insects and crustaceans belong to the phylum Arthropoda. In Poland, about a dozen Porcellio species occur [3], the most common being the rough woodlouse Porcellio scaber Photo.2).
Look for them under stones, in wall crevices, among leaf litter and rotting wood, or even in cellars and greenhouses [4]. You might also encounter Oniscus asellus and pillbugs Armadillidium, which roll into defensive balls. All make excellent subjects for simple behavioral tests.
No animal should ever suffer or be killed unnecessarily. Despite their chitinous armor, woodlice are delicate. Handle them gently and house them in a dark, well‑ventilated container with slightly moist soil or peat plus leaf litter or wood shavings. Keep the temperature around 20–22 °C (68–72 °F). Under these conditions, they remain healthy for days, even up to two weeks, with occasional plant material for food.
Woodlice pose minimal risk: they’re not venomous and unlikely to transmit serious pathogens, though they inhabit decaying matter that can harbor microbes.
For full anatomical details, see my previous article. Briefly, P. scaber reaches about 17 mm (0.67 in) in length, with a dorsal surface covered in tiny tubercles. Males are bluish‑gray; females and juveniles are lighter and speckled. Some specimens are brown or orange [5] [6]. Nocturnal by nature, they navigate using tactile and chemical cues. Their vision is limited to two small compound eyes of about 20 ommatidia each (Photo.3).
They walk on seven pairs of thoracic legs, have ventral mouthparts, and breathe through two pairs of pleopodal lungs. At the rear are the telson and uropods. Females carry eggs and juveniles on their pleopods for 40–50 days. Lifespan can reach two years, so they seek sheltered overwintering sites.
Experiment
Building the choice chamber is simple. Use a ~10 cm (4 in) Petri dish, glass or plastic. Divide it into two halves: one side with a desiccant (activated molecular sieves, silica gel, etc.), the other with damp cotton or fabric. Cover with a porous overlay (e.g., a plastic lid punctured with a needle). The setup is shown in Photo.4.
Place about 10–20 woodlice on the divider, cover the dish (Photo.5), and distribute them evenly.
Then cover half the dish — perpendicular to the divider — with black paper (Photo.6) and illuminate from above or place in a bright room. Let run 15–45 minutes without disturbance.
The chamber divides into four zones (Fig.1):
- Zone I – dry & dark
- Zone II – humid & dark
- Zone III – humid & light
- Zone IV – dry & light

Afterward, note each woodlouse’s location. A typical result is shown in Photo.7.
Most woodlice congregate in Zone II (humid-dark); some in Zone III (humid-light). Dry zones are avoided. Across 50 trials, the averages (Table 1) were:
Zone | % of woodlice |
I (dry & dark) | 6 % |
II (humid & dark) | 72 % |
III (humid & light) | 21 % |
IV (dry & light) | 1 % |
Your results may vary, but the overall trend should hold.
When done properly, woodlice experience no harm and can be released back into their original habitat.
Explanation
In this experiment, we observed a fascinating behavioral phenomenon. Organisms have evolved diverse movement strategies and mechanisms. Nastic movements — seen in touch‑sensitive plants like Mimosa pudica or Berberis vulgaris and specialized growth movements, such as the trap leaves of Drosera capensis, are examples [7] [8] [9]. There are also taxes, tropisms, and other responses [10].
Another intriguing form of movement is kinesis [11], a non‑directional locomotor response to stimulus intensity. Kinesis can be positive (movement increases with stronger stimulus) or negative (movement decreases when the stimulus intensifies). It’s generally divided into two types:
- Klinokinesis – stimulus intensity regulates the frequency of directional changes;
- Orthokinesis – stimulus intensity regulates movement speed.
In woodlice, klinokinesis appears as alternating turns, preventing circular movement and enabling a zigzag path — vital for navigating crevices and escaping predators. Today's experiment demonstrated orthokinesis: woodlice show negative orthokinesis to humidity (they move faster in drier air) and positive orthokinesis to light (they move faster under brighter illumination). As a result, even without directional sensing, they tend to congregate in the most favorable environment — humid and dark. If they wander into drier or brighter zones (where they’re more exposed to predators and risk of desiccation), they speed up until they return to suitable conditions. Woodlice also exhibit aggregation behavior, as observed here.
Note that these simple responses, combined with other mechanisms, enable the woodlouse to achieve critical goals: survival and successful reproduction.
References:
- [1] Ples M., W labiryncie - decyzje równonoga (eng. In the Maze: How Woodlice Make Decisions), Biologia w Szkole (eng. Biology in School), 4 (2019), Forum Media Polska Sp. z o.o., pp. 56-62 back
- [2] Hughes R. N., Turn alternation in woodlice (Porcellio scaber), Animal Behaviour, 15 (2-3), 1967, pp. 282-286 back
- [3] Jura Cz., Bezkręgowce. Podstawy morfologii funkcjonalnej, systematyki i filogenezy, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa, 2002, pp. 293-295 back
- [4] Harding P. T., Sutton S. L., Woodlice in Britain and Irleand: distribution and habitat, NERC, 1985, pp. 96 back
- [5] Mckenzie G. J., Porcelio scaber, online: http://www.porcellio.scaber.org/woodlice/ps_ident.htm [24.05.2019], the page is currently inactive at its original location and is available as an archived copy from June 24, 2019: https://web.archive.org/web/20190724232936/http://www.porcellio.scaber.org/woodlice/ps_ident.htm [12.05.2021] back
- [6] Sowiński M., Prosionek (Porcellio spinicornis) – lądowy skorupiak, online: https://swiatmakrodotcom.wordpress.com/2015/02/21/prosionek-porcellio-spinicornis-ladowy-skorupiak/ [24.05.2019] back
- [7] Ples M., Wstydliwa roślina (eng. Sensitive plant), Biologia w Szkole (eng. Biology in School), 6 (2015), Forum Media Polska Sp. z o.o., pp. 52-56 back
- [8] Ples M., Roślinny bokser? Szybkie ruchy pręcików berberysu (eng. A Plant Boxer? The Rapid Stamen Movements of Barberry), Biologia w Szkole, 3 (2020), Forum Media Polska Sp. z o.o., pp. 81-85 back
- [9] Ples M., O rosiczce słów kilka, czyli wyhoduj żywą muchołapkę! (eng. A Few Words About Sundews: Grow Your Own Living Flytrap!), Biologia w Szkole (eng. Biology in School), 1 (2016), Forum Media Polska Sp. z o.o., pp. 51-56 back
- [10] Kopcewicz J., Ruchy roślin, w: Fizjologia roślin, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa, 2002, pp. 586-601 back
- [11] Gorban A.N., Çabukoǧlu N., Basic model of purposeful kinesis, Ecological Complexity, 2018, 33, pp. 75-83 back
All photographs and illustrations were created by the author.
Marek Ples