Pneumatic Artificial Muscles in Our Lab
Polish version is here |
The following article was originally published in the journal for educators Biologia w Szkole (Biology in School) (3/2021):

In our explorations, we have frequently dealt with the topic of locomotion, considering the mechanisms of movement and related phenomena among representatives of the plant kingdom Planta and the animal kingdom Animalia [1] [2] [3] [4]. Until now, we have tended to focus more on the foundations of plant movement, as those mechanisms tend to be more foreign to us—after all, we ourselves belong to animal organisms. Today, however, I would like you, Dear Reader, to accompany me in simple experiments concerning muscles, which provide the basic “drive” for animal bodies, whether in terms of locomotion or other movements.
The muscle musculus is an organ endowed with the ability to contract actively. It is one of the structural and functional components of the locomotor system as a whole. Notably, muscles form the active, or drive, elements of this system. They are found in higher invertebrates Invertebrata and in all vertebrates Vertebrata.
The tissue that builds these organs consists of highly specialized cells. Muscles are connected in a specific way to the skeleton, which acts as a supporting structure: internal in vertebrates and external in arthropods Arthropoda, for instance. By changing their dimensions, they cause individual skeletal elements to move relative to one another. The source of energy for muscles is chemical substances, primarily the glycogen stored in them as well as glucose supplied by the circulatory system. The shape and structure of a muscle strictly depend on the function it performs in the organism [5].
Although many classification methods for muscles exist—based on structure, function, or shape—the most fundamental form of categorization seems to be the one that distinguishes three main groups:
- smooth muscles,
- skeletal (striated) muscles,
- cardiac muscle (striated heart muscle).
In terms of structure, the simplest muscles in the human body are the smooth muscles responsible for movements independent of our will, such as pupil dilation or the peristaltic movements of the intestines. In contrast, striated muscles are much more complex, so it is no surprise that they represent a significantly later evolutionary innovation and enable our locomotion. A separate type displaying unique characteristics is the cardiac muscle that pumps blood.
Skeletal (striated) muscle is a type of muscle tissue composed of strongly elongated cylindrical cells. The cell nuclei are located peripherally, while in the center of the cell there are numerous myofibrils that extend along its entire length. These myofibrils are composed of alternating thin actin and thick myosin filaments. This particular feature of their structure appears under the microscope as the characteristic striation. Both actin and myosin are motor proteins—they have the ability to move in relation to each other, essentially “sliding” past one another. This results in a reduction in the length of the muscle fibers, whereas the dimensions of the filaments themselves remain unchanged. Striated muscles work in a manner dependent on the will, but they become fatigued relatively quickly [6].
Muscles as driving elements caught the attention of scientists involved in biomimetics during the second half of the 20th century.
This field, also known as bionics, is a multidisciplinary science that studies the structure and principles of how organisms function. The goal is to adapt these principles for use in engineering and the design of technical devices that replicate organisms or, in practice, merely certain elements thereof. Biomimetics aims to investigate, through scientific experimentation, the processes governing the functioning of organisms and to use them in various areas of human activity, such as automation, electronics, mechanics, and construction. An intriguing example is the invention of Velcro in 1941 by George de Mestral, commonly used today for so-called hook-and-loop fasteners. This solution mimics the method by which seeds of the greater burdock Arctium lappa disperse in nature: they attach themselves to animal fur and travel along with it, a noteworthy example of zoochory [7].
Today, we routinely use various types of drive mechanisms, for instance, internal combustion engines in vehicles, as well as electric motors—especially in miniature devices. These mechanisms typically produce usable work in the form of rotational movement of the motor shaft. This is notably different from how force and work are generated in living organisms by means of muscles. On the other hand, the efficiency of natural muscles and their relatively small mass and volume compared to the force they generate are extremely appealing from the standpoint of engineering and industry. Consequently, biomimetics researchers are pursuing intense studies to develop artificial muscles, that is, structures that replicate at least some of the properties of natural organs as drive systems. One particularly interesting example is the artificial muscle made from nylon, described in the journal Science [8]. Photo 1 shows such an artificial muscle fiber (AMF) produced in my lab.
The artificial nylon muscle is elastic and stretches under a load, as shown in Phot.2A.
Around the muscle, an additional plastic thread coated with metallic silver has been wound. When an electrical current is passed through it, the entire structure heats up slightly, causing the muscle to contract and lift the weight, thus generating usable work (Phot.2B). The muscle’s action is reversible: once the current flow is switched off, the muscle cools quickly and relaxes.

Aside from the experimental artificial nylon muscle described above, there are also other technologies already in use on an industrial scale today. One of these is pneumatic artificial muscles (sometimes called “muscles”). Their principle of operation and general construction are not overly complicated, so we can even attempt to build a simple model of such a drive device.
Construction and Observations
To build a working model of a pneumatic artificial muscle, we need the following materials:
- flexible tubing, e.g., aquarium tubing (Phot.3A),
- stretchable tubing, for example, a fragment of a long balloon (Phot.3B),
- a cable sleeve/braided sleeve (Phot.3C),
- zip ties (Phot.4D).
The dimensions of all components should be selected according to individual needs.
It is worth discussing the braided sleeve (Phot.3C), which is used for protecting and organizing various types of cables (for example, in computer assemblies). It is composed of intersecting plastic fibers (Phot.4).
An important feature of this braided sleeve—critical for constructing an artificial muscle—is that it is a dynamic structure: the fibers cross at different angles depending on the conditions. When we compress the braided sleeve, the fibers intersect at an angle closer to 90 degrees (Phot.4B), whereas after elongation, the angles change considerably (Phot.4A). This leads to a change in dimensions: while the length of the braided sleeve decreases, its diameter increases, and vice versa (Phot.5).
All the components should be assembled according to the schematic in Rys.1. The stretchable tube is placed inside the braided sleeve, both of which are cut to the same length. We then insert one end of the flexible tubing into the stretchable tube, and clamp everything together with zip ties (you can also use multiple windings of strong thread). The connection must be airtight to allow inflating the stretchable tube inside the braided sleeve. This completes the construction of the artificial muscle model.

In this configuration, the artificial muscle resembles skeletal muscle: it has elements analogous to a belly and tendons (Phot.6).

When the pressure inside the muscle is equal to atmospheric pressure, the muscle is in the relaxation phase (Phot.6A). After the pressure is increased, for instance by pumping air in with a syringe, contraction occurs—the muscle expands radially and clearly shortens in length (Phot.6B).
To estimate the degree of contraction, we measure the muscle in both states, as shown in Phot.7.
As we can see, during relaxation, the muscle length is 80 mm, approx. 3.15 in, whereas during contraction, it is 61 mm, approx. 2.40 in. Its length therefore decreases by about 25%, a result comparable to that of certain natural muscles.
As for the model’s capacity for performing work, it is surprisingly high. The described model, just a few centimeters in length (about 1–2 in), easily lifts a 400 g, approx. 14.11 oz (0.88 lb), mass (Phot.8). In an extreme test, it managed to lift a 2 kg, approx. 70.55 oz (4.41 lb), weight, although this required higher pressure.
Such artificial muscles can be combined with skeletal models. It is also possible to manufacture muscles with more than one “belly.”
Explanation
As we see, building a functional model of a pneumatic artificial muscle is not difficult. Importantly, similar actuators have been employed for several decades with increasing frequency in industry—so this is not merely a curiosity.
A pneumatic muscle has minimal mass, largely because its main component is a stretchable conduit. The logarithmic correlation between pressure and the force generated by such a component is analogous to that found in actual biological systems, making it easier to replicate the behavior of biological muscles—for instance, in prostheses. Additionally, the elasticity is similar in both cases, as shown in Phot.9.
Furthermore, because gas is compressible, pneumatic muscles allow for partial absorption of excessive force, enabling more precise operation. They would thus be suitable for powering active prosthetic limbs. Unfortunately, such devices also have certain drawbacks—the most significant is the challenge of controlling them.
I hope that I have managed to pique your interest, Dear Reader, in this fascinating area of study known as biomimetics.
References:
- [1] Ples M., Iglica pospolita - roślinna katapulta i ruchliwe nasiona (eng. Erodium cicutarium - a plant catapult and moving seeds), Biologia w Szkole (Biology in School) (Biology in School), 5 (2020), Forum Media Polska Sp. z o.o., pp. 54-57 back
- [2] Ples M., Roślinny bokser? Szybkie ruchy pręcików berberysu (eng. A Plant Boxer? The Rapid Stamen Movements of Barberry), Biologia w Szkole (Biology in School), 3 (2020), Forum Media Polska Sp. z o.o., pp. 81-85 back
- [3] Ples M., Mały gigant - rzecz o karaczanie madagaskarskim (eng. The Little Giant: A Story of the Madagascar Hissing Cockroach), Biologia w Szkole (Biology in School), 1 (2017), Forum Media Polska Sp. z o.o., pp. 56-63 back
- [4] Ples M., W labiryncie - decyzje równonoga (eng. In the Maze: How Woodlice Make Decisions), Biologia w Szkole (Biology in School), 4 (2019), Forum Media Polska Sp. z o.o., pp. 56-62 back
- [5] Bochenek A., Reicher M., Anatomia Człowieka, PZWL Wydawnictwo Lekarskie, Warszawa, 2010 back
- [6] Sawicki W., Histologia, PZWL Wydawnictwo Lekarskie, Warszawa, 2009 back
- [7] McSweeney T. J., Raha S., Better to Light One Candle: The Christophers' Three Minutes a Day: Millennial Edition, Continuum International Publishing Group, 1999, pp. 55 back
- [8] Haines C. S., Lima M. D., Li N., et al, Artificial Muscles from Fishing Line and Sewing Thread, Science, 2014, 343(6173), pp. 868-872 back
All photographs and illustrations were created by the author.
Marek Ples